RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

(UPDATED) Debate Talk (+ OPEN THREAD)

Did you just watch the Democratic presidential candidates’ debate aired on CNN? It reairs starting at 8pm PT (11pm ET). And you can watch via CNN.

I loved the great experiment in using YouTube questions from “regular” people. The videos were clever, funny, insightful. The question about assault weapons was shocking. The take-off on Mr. Bill was a riot, and succeeded in depicting the danger of global warming perfectly. Here’s hoping that YouTube questions get used more and more in these debates. CLICK “READ ON” FOR THE UPDATES:
 
From The Nation:

The YouTube presidential debate actually lived up to its hype. For about two hours last night, American political discourse was more genuine, diverse and – just as the Internet visionaries promised – more authentic than most days on the campaign trail. [...]

Stephen Sorta, a middle aged Californian, pressed the candidates with an idea that sparked one of the most revealing exchanges of the evening. He asked the candidates to commit, during their first year in the White House, to unconditional meetings with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to “bridge the gap that divides our countries.” Obama seized the idea, committing to the meetings and aggressive diplomatic engagement, while also blasting the Bush administration’s “ridiculous” notion that “not talking to countries is punishment.” It was a fine answer for Democratic voters fed up with Bush’s cowboy foreign policy. But then Clinton and Edwards both offered much deeper responses, worth quoting in full:

CLINTON: Well, I will not promise to meet with the leaders of these countries during my first year. I will promise a very vigorous diplomatic effort because I think it is not that you promise a meeting at that high a level before you know what the intentions are. I don’t want to be used for propaganda purposes. I don’t want to make a situation even worse. But I certainly agree that we need to get back to diplomacy, which has been turned into a bad word by this administration. And I will purse very vigorous diplomacy.

And I will use a lot of high-level presidential envoys to test the waters, to feel the way. But certainly, we’re not going to just have our president meet with Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez and, you know, the president of North Korea, Iran and Syria until we know better what the way forward would be.

(APPLAUSE)

COOPER: Senator Edwards, would you meet with Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong Il?

EDWARDS: Yes, and I think actually Senator Clinton’s right though. Before that meeting takes place, we need to do the work, the diplomacy, to make sure that that meeting’s not going to be used for propaganda purposes, will not be used to just beat down the United States of America in the world community.

But I think this is just a piece of a bigger question, which is, what do we actually do? What should the president of the United States do to restore America’s moral leadership in the world. It’s not enough just to lead with bad leaders. In addition to that, the world needs to hear from the president of the United States about who we are, what it is we represent.

COOPER: Time.

EDWARDS: That, in fact, we believe in equality, we believe in diversity, that they are at the heart and soul of what the United States of America is.

Edwards and Clinton are right to emphasize that Bush’s incompetent rejection of diplomacy cannot simply be replaced with diplomacy on the cheap. Even American allies have to jockey for presidential level meetings, so the dictators and tyrants of the world don’t deserve speed diplomacy for nothing in return. But that doesn’t mean it was a bad question. I actually think Mr. Sorta’s idealistic, big picture question is precisely the kind of issue that voters care about — and the traditional media often refuses to raise. As CNN producer David Bohrman recently explained, many YouTube entries were great because they pose “straightforward, interesting questions that the mainstream media couldn’t — or wouldn’t — think to ask.”

MORE:

Scott Paul, writing at Steve Clemons’ Washington Note, has a debate recap.

Salon also has a minute-by-minute account, and takes some fun, deserved swipes at Mike Gravel for appearing “unhinged” and because he “recently declared bankruptcy”: “What you missed while watching ‘Ask a Ninja’

  • Leslie

    Here’s the YouTube link in case anyone misses it on CNN. You can leave comments and rate the videos too.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    OT: Radar Online has a very funny review of the new book by Robert (“I’m the center of the universe”) Novak.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    Leslie picked up on something significant re refreshing the page to see the latest comments: You’ll get the latest if you click on the banner at the top of the page, rather than just hitting Refresh on your browser. Dunno why, but it is so!

  • CK

    I turned to another channel after none of the candidates would even ask the two fat ladies how much weight their doctors had suggested they lose. The one thing you can guarantee about democraps is that they will never suggest anything like personal responsibility should be part of the health care mix.

  • Centrocitta

    Ironic, isn’t it, that while the Bush Administration sent American soldiers to fight a war in Iraq for Israel, those same soldiers must now sue the VA for the care and benefits they arn’t receiving because US taxpayers give billions to Israel every year. Is something wrong with this picture?

  • Mr.Murder
  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC
  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    MORE:

    SOFIA, Bulgaria, July 24 — After more than eight years in jail in Libya, five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor stepped off the French presidential plane here in Bulgaria’s capital early this morning where they were greeted by crying relatives and Bulgaria’s top officials.

    They were accompanied by the European Union’s foreign affairs commissioner, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, and the wife of France’s president, Cécilia Sarkozy, who had helped secure their release and had flown with the medical workers from Libya….

    [...]

    The medical workers’ plight began in 1999 when they were charged with intentionally infecting 400 Libyan children with H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS, at the Benghazi Children’s Hospital where they worked in Benghazi, Libya’s second largest city.

    The Libyan leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, said that the nurses had acted on the orders of the Central Intelligence Agency and Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, and that their actions were part of a plot to destabilize the Libyan state. …

    This case had disturbed me. The charges were absurd on their face. The imprisonment — and torture — of the nurses and doctor were cruel. I’d hoped that diplomacy would eventually prevail. Good for the EU and France.

  • mudkitty

    And?

  • Fred C. Dobbs

    As I anticipated, Obama channeled Gary Hart once again and hit the bait on the first cast, in shallow water. The more seasoned and thoughtful pols, Clinton and Edwards, gave answers reflecting their experience in governance and foreign affairs.

    Generally, US foreign policy since 2000 can be characterized as, “We got the Bomb, so screw you!”

    About what you’d expect from your junior high football coach or some bunch of spoiled frat boys.

  • CK

    Gravel came across quite calm and sane.
    Kucinich was a bit lame with the texting thing.
    The rest of the cattle call phoned it in.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    Just in:

    New Petreus plan sees at least 2 more years in Iraq

    By Robert Burns
    AP Military Writer
    War plan sets summer of 2008 as goal for U.S. troops to establish localized security

    BAGHDAD — A revised U.S. military plan envisions establishing security at the local level in Baghdad and elsewhere by the summer of 2008, although it likely would take another year to get Iraqi forces ready to enforce any newfound stability, U.S. officials said today. …

  • osama_been_forgotten

    I dunno;
    Gravel got all “conspiracy-theory-ish” on Obama on his campaign funding.

    Obama answered it well. Though, I really would like to hear a real explanation on his “bundles” and the other accusations Gravel made – particularly the one about foreign-owned banks.

    I’m still rooting for Obama, because I think he’s the only one who can beat Hillary. In fact, I think Obama should select Gravel as his running mate. Or Kucinich.

  • Rob

    Like I said if anyone thinks we are going to totaly pull out your just kidding yourself.

    On the debates, I can’t wait to see if the Republicans try the same thing…

  • ybnormal

    It seems like Congress’ wariness of impeachment is for two reasons. One is, as long as the Bush approval ratings keep falling, the better the re-election chances for anyone to the left of Bush. By Nov ’08, those to the left of Bush might include half the Republicans.

    The second reason is that some in Congress seem to believe that an impeachment attempt resulting in failure to convict could actually reduce the odds for ultimate success.

    The only problem with all this is, by Nov’08, it might be too late. We all read comments about some sort of martial law declaration, which on the surface sounds like conspiracy theory. I don’t subscribe to it on face value. However, I do believe that the Bush Admin has an agenda focused on international domination of large parts of world economies, without the limits of traditional borders of countries, and without traditional government accountability, owned by unaccountable trans-national private business interests.

    To get this, they’re probably not as interested in permanent martial law in the U.S., but it’s possible they might resort to some limited form of it to leverage their agenda. Naturally, this is just a theory, since I can’t prove it with evidence, only observing patterns.

    Meanwhile, Congress is definitely behind, because they continue to just speak re-actively, instead of acting pro-actively. All the while the Bush Admin continues to push ahead with uncompromising determination, and consistently gaining ground in the process. The future as usual is fuzzy, but the possibility exists that new government after ’08 might be a moot point, if large enough amounts of international economies have already been hi-jacked for privatization.

    Maybe what Congress needs to do is start racking up some high-profile successes which are most likely to succeed now, and in the process, get more of the valid reasons for impeachment out in the open to the general public. The sooner the better.

    One way to start might be what’s known as Implied Contempt against Harriet Miers, and anyone else using ‘executive privilege’ to refuse to testify; where they don’t have to depend on DOJ; it’s all ‘in House’ so to speak; and also the Senate for that matter. The House and/or Senate Sergeant-at-Arms can arrest her, and she can be held in jail in a civil contempt procedure, as coercion to testify, analogous to the way Judi Miller was held. If it’s not an actual criminal conviction or criminal sentence, it would trump the possibility of a presidential pardon, because there wouldn’t be a crime to apply the pardon to. A good first step in re-asserting their co-equal branch authority. If she gives in and testifies, so much the better. If not, at least a line was drawn in the sand. Conyers has already referenced this as a possibility.

    Meanwhile, simultaneously start hearings investigating impeachment, and keep it in the news, with new revelations every day. Also at the same time they could publicly announce the in-session delivery of weekly letters from the House to the Senate, advising on progress and asking in so many words if they’re ready to get on board yet. Have the delivery timed to interrupt any one of the Senate’s long-winded speeches. Hopefully, maybe enough on both sides of the aisle could be expedited to add up to a 67-conviction of impeachment majority, before it’s too late to matter.

  • Leslie
  • Brenda Stewart

    Oh My God! that was just what I told my friend the other day that I felt that they failed to incise bush’s own head from his colon!

  • Patrick Henry

    YBNORMAL..

    I Find Your Comments Interesting and Appreciate Your Thoughts and Contributions..Thanks..

  • ybnormal

    According to the AP, citing Bush’s own statements today in the story “Bush warns anew of terror threat”, Bush virtually agrees that the fall of Saddam Hussein’s government was what enabled Al-Qaida to become established in Iraq.

    How interesting; is he now calling himself a liar?
    It would seem that the logical conclusion by anyone hearing or reading this story would have to be that, by extension, the continued chaos caused by continued U.S. presence in Iraq, is what is causing continued Al-Qaida strength; and that the conclusion is according to the evidence that Bush himself is citing.

    Bush cited intelligence that:

    _Al-Qaida in Iraq was founded not by an Iraqi but by Jordanian-born Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who had deep relations with al-Qaida leaders. The president said Zarqawi, who was killed by U.S. forces last year, set up operations with terrorist associates in Iraq long before U.S.-led forces arrived, and that in the violence and instability following Saddam Hussein’s fall, was able to expand the “size, scope and lethality” of his operation. Zarqawi formally joined al-Qaida in 2004 and pledged allegiance to bin Laden, he said.

    _The merger gave al-Qaida senior leadership “a foothold in Iraq to extend its geographic presence and to plot external operations and to tout the centrality of the jihad in Iraq to solicit direct monetary support elsewhere.”

  • ybnormal

    Note, the story above keeps being updated, so the exact wordage may change slightly.

  • Semanticleo

    OT; But thought you all would like a heads’ up on Marcy’s recent post with a damning chronolgy.

    http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2007/07/cunningham-cifa.html

  • PrchrLady

    Thanks for link SC, I usually go there as one of first stops, but got sidetracked and might have missed it. Marcy is SO good… I think her book should be required reading for all law students… anyone who hasn’t read it, should by all means beg, borrow, or preferably buy several copies and pass them around. Powerful writer she is, and lays out Wilson case in great detail, yet in terms even a layman can understand…

  • http://cujo359.blogspot.com Cujo359

    I read the transcript over at CNN, but have only seen clips of the debate. I liked many of the questions, and I agree that they’re the sort of direct questions that news corporations, and even PBS, never seem to get around to asking. I also liked how Anderson Cooper appeared to take the questions seriously, and tried to keep the candidates on topic.

    It was a good debate. I think most of the candidates answered at least a few questions well, and as with the question highlighted here, I think there were some revealing exchanges.

    Here’s the link to the transcript, by the way:

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.transcript/index.html

  • Centrocitta

    Al-Qaida in Iraq was founded not by an Iraqi but by Jordanian-born Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who had deep relations with al-Qaida leaders

    …..Note, the story above keeps being updated, so the exact wordage may change slightly…..

    Update, Update: His mother calls from Jordan and asks, “How is your friend, the Jewish”?

    Update, Update: He has a second job late at night delivering the newspaper to Michael Dell’s house. You know, Michael Dell, the big Zionist who lives in a ten million dollar compound in Austin, Texas.

    Update, Update: A nice couple from Minnesota constantly talking about Sweden, Sweden, Sweden say Bush went to Iraq beause Mossad told him to.

  • Homer

    RE: Al-Dawa and the SCIRI Giving the US the One Fingered Salute

    Iran’s growing presence in Iraq

    [snip]

    “The Iranians are running the ship in Iraq, not the Americans. They also have [many] more chips on the table in Iraq than the US,” says Riad Kahwaji, who heads the Dubai-based Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis. “The situation in Iraq is strategically more in favor of the Iranians than the Americans.”

    Iran gives al-Maliki’s government an aircraft as a gift

    “The Iraqi government would like to thank the Islamic government of Iran for this present, which we hope will contribute to the development of relations and common interests between the two nations,” al-Dabbagh told The Associated Press.

    [snip]

    The gift underlines the warmth of ties between the al-Maliki government and Tehran since the 2003 ouster of Saddam Hussein, who fought a ruinous, eight-year war against Iran in the 1980s.

  • PrchrLady

    This has been a whirlwind of a week, and it is only Wednesday…

    I had planned to write something here a couple of days ago about an article I read by Glen Greenwald, one of our favorite ‘pundits’, David Brooks, but my week was sidetracked a bit, and now seems to be settling once again…
    http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/07/17/brooks/index.html

    a few people have mentioned that they would like to hear more about my spirituality and faith. I am beginning a project on that, and will be posting more on that in the near future. it will be a ‘work in process’, as long as I share, as I hope that when people read and listen to what I say, that if so moved, will share thier own insights and understanding. I believe that in sharing we can grow together, as well as stronger in any faith or spirituality any one of us claim as our own. I look forward to hearing your responses to this idea…

    The web site here is really coming together very nicely… Thanks for all the hard, and diligent work that Susan, Andrew, and so many others have contributed to making this the best ‘blogspot’ on the net… bar none… and the comments here are always worth a couple of hours of read and thought… love ya all…

    I thot the debates were great, watched most on u tube highlights, then caught part on CNN… I still haven’t made up my mind yet, but after what I hear today about Clinton and Obama, I hope they both mend their ways of dealing with disagrements/confrontations, I would tend to think ‘politics as usual’, and rule both of them out or down line on my short list… the debates did help me knock of one or two… although I could see those same people in some other kind of Cabinet level position in a Dem WH…

    Just wanted to check in, and say hi, still have 12 pages of notes to sort and rewrite… then type… email to answer, etc… takes this old lady longer to get all that kind of stuff done than it did in years past… oh, BTW, I am so thankful that Nickolson resigned from VA… and vets are suing… maybe we will see some justice after all… will post more later… Marlene

blog comments powered by Disqus