Petraeus Pecker Politics or Benghazi Fall Guy?

If they can prove enough shit on Obama he is not the next President yet.

As I understand it,Electors chosen on Election Day meet in their respective state capitals (or in the case of Washington, D.C., within the District) on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December, at which time they cast their electoral votes on separate ballots for President and Vice President.

They are free to vote whomever they wish.

The FBI investigation is seeing whether she had improper access to
General Petraeus’ emails and may have had access to his … may have
accidentally or deliberately had access to classified information. And
so we know this investigation is taking place, and that it has
identified Paula Broadwell.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-david-petraeus-paula-broadwell-2012-11#ixzz2BnDm5SY4

So when does she have to testify to Congress ?

Why was the FBI even looking at the head of the CIA’s emails? That is pretty off.

Larry, I suspected as much and logged on tonight to see if you had something to say about it. Of course there’s been the usual chatter — how dare he expose himself to blackmail due to the affair, and possibly compromise national security!?!?!? Yet it reportedly took place in Afghanistan, before Petraeus became CIA director! I wonder if in the WH’s view this was considered an asset — a handy tool to manipulate Petraeus if ever necessary. In other words, maybe the WH was a blackmailer, like you’ve suggested. It certainly seems that he did the WH’s bidding when he contradicted other intelligence reports that said the 9/11 attack was perpetrated by organized terrorists. Media’s knee-jerk disavowels that this revelation has nothing to do with Benghazi is sickening. Is there no limit to their complicity? Were those 4 men allowed to be murdered because dead men tell no tales?

This will go no where… unfortunately….

Good article, Larry. I personally think it is the video. I believe the video was blamed on the terrorist attack and Petraeus knew and didn’t want to lie to Congress when approached with the questions. He probably has the names of the people involved with the coverup for the whitehouse. But, what does it matter? The american people don’t see evil when it comes to oBama. He is seen as a God. The only way he will be taken out of the whitehouse is not by school records, dual citizenship, libya’s failures, etc. etc. It will be a scandal concerning his lust . As Clinton, it will come to that shortly. Lust is too strong to overcome and the american people will see him as “what he really is” not some nice married man with two kids. Digging into his lust background and bringing his homosexual partners to light, would be his downfall. Most of the women that voted for him see OBama as a family man, a man of love, etc. etc. His downfall will be the things he is covering up with his lust.

One thing I learned about inside the beltway is that sexual explots including some very deviant ones are pervasive and not a secret. I guess it comes genetrally under the heading of “opposition research” and is not used unless and until necessary.

People knew that Mark Foley was gay and had a proclivity to young male interns, but it was not revealed until it was suitable to do so. The sake with Anthony Weiner and his weird twitters until he publically rebuked Obama over his diss of Netanyahu. About a week or 2 later suddenly people found out of Weiner and he was forced to resign.

I am certain that Axelrod/Jarret/Obama knew about Patraeus for quite some time and were going to use it to try and prevent him from testifying or making his testimony lose credibility. The same is being done with Holder to limit damage to Obama directly concerning Fast and Furious.

This will unravel but it will take an aggressive House GOP to force the issue into articles of impeachment if that is warranted.

Did husband of woman named in Petraeus scandal reveal he knew of her affair to NYT advice column letter in July?

“My wife is having an affair with a government executive. His role is to manage a project whose progress is seen worldwide as a demonstration of American leadership. (This might seem hyperbolic, but it is not an exaggeration.)

I have met with him on several occasions, and he has been gracious. (I doubt if he is aware of my knowledge.) I have watched the affair intensify over the last year, and I have also benefited from his generosity.

He is engaged in work that I am passionate about and is absolutely the right person for the job. I strongly feel that exposing the affair will create a major distraction that would adversely impact the success of an important effort.

My issue: Should I acknowledge this affair and finally force closure? Should I suffer in silence for the next year or two for a project I feel must succeed?

Should I be “true to my heart” and walk away from the entire miserable situation and put the episode behind me? NAME WITHHELD”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2230973/Did-husband-woman-named-Petraeus-affair-admit-dilemma-advice-column-letter-New-York-Times-July.html

So when the Times of London (late last year) reports that there was a ship with 400 tons of weaponry from Lybia to Syria via Turkey, who was the middle man in the “sale”? No doubt Turkey was because they were NATO weapons that killed innocents on the Turkish side of the border with Syria and the Turks were not retaliating.

The SOS was out there, two weeks before the election, saying there will be a “realigning” of the groups the US is “dealing” with a desire to have relations with the jihadists on the ground instead of Syrians in London in exile.

My working theory is the rise in violence culminating in the deaths of 4 Americans was a weapons deal gone bad. The compound was a waypoint for the arms and word got out that was where the weapons were stored. The RSO said that the compound, 3 football fields in size, was to big to defend properly. If you where on the recieving end of all these arms and then the Supplier broke the terms of the agreement….which was leaked after the Turkish amb left the compound …

LJ, what the WH is hiding is the company it keeps and where the diversion of the proceeds went from the sale of these arms… Me thinks into BO’s re-election funds.

It puzzled me that Petraeus took a job in this anti-military administration in the first place.

Imbedded or in bed? Watch the Daily Show video at bottom. What will Jon Stewart have to say about Broadwell next week. Stay tuned.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2230975/Petreaus-mistress-Paula-Broadwells-awkward-interview-Jon-Stewart-The-Daily-Show.html

The Petraeus resignation raises all sorts of new questions he can answer, but will he?

How do they (not just Obama) get people to make the crazy irresponsible statements that get made? Before this Patraeus episode erupted (so to speak) I have said it must be like working for The Firm.

Those pulling the stings must be getting, even creating damning interludes and evidence to blackmail the their pawns into doing their bidding.

With all the drunken bashes the Secret Service and friends throw, what traps have they set and what other tales do they now have to tell? Yeah, it is classic old school spy stuff, but people like Patraeus and Powell are just as human and fallable as the worst among us because they also have orders of magnitude more hubris and ego.

I belive the Clinton’s found the dirt on Obama. But when they presented it to him, Obama opened his own Clinton Dirt drawers. Stalemate.

Is the leadership of the US stacked with manipulated blackmailed members? It would sure explain a lot.

What is needed to expose Benghazi and Obama to the level of a watergate is a press that is willing to investigate. The Washington post and new York times are both jokes now. The politicians can be moved by public opinion to investigate. Public opinion can be moved by the media. If no one In the media has any ovaries or balls… We don’t get much in the way of results

Interesting interview of KT McFarland (held national security posts in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan Administrations), regarding Petreaus. She says when she was in Afghanistan & interviewed Petreaus, there were definitely rumors about Petreaus & Broadwell. Her opinion is that Petreaus is in a position of power at this point and not cowering.

She believes that when he became CIA director, he would have been polygraphed & one of the first questions is the obligatory — anything in your background that would be embarrassing? She believes he would have answered truthfully (disclosing the affair) & his file would have gone to the White House.

In order for a government email account to be accessed the person would need that users Common Access Card (CAC) and pin (note, if CAC is removed from CAC reader the computer system locks the user until CAC is reinserted and pin re-entered). Many corporations use a similar type of authentication system. For one, I highly doubt many attributes of the alleged story. It would seem more likely that Petraus decided to tell the truth about Benghazi, thus facilitating the events of forced resignation. In the past few months many high ranking career military officers have been removed from their assignments over alleged sexual improprieties. Seems kind of odd. Add in the high likeliness that the entire election was a fabricated event, complete with a complicit media. Some media outlets had ran “Obama Wins Election” complete with strikingly similar results, right down to the Red vs. Blue state breakdown.