RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

CIA Director on the Hook

Mike Morrell, the acting CIA Director, may have been a good analyst but the boy does not have a clue about navigating the shark filled waters of Washington. AP has the story:

Lawmakers accused the CIA of misleading the makers of the Osama bin Laden raid film “Zero Dark Thirty” by allegedly telling them that harsh interrogation methods helped track down the terrorist mastermind. . . .

A Senate Intelligence Committee investigation into the CIA’s detainee program found that such methods produced no useful intelligence.

The CIA’s acting director, Michael Morell, recently contradicted that finding. In a statement last month to employees, he said that while the film was wrong to depict harsh techniques as key to finding bin Laden, those interrogations did produce some useful intelligence.

“Some came from detainees subjected to enhanced techniques, but there were many other sources as well,” Morell said.

In a letter to the CIA this week, Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., John McCain, R-Ariz., and others asked Morell to back up his claim and to share documents showing what the filmmakers were told.

They asked him to provide what information was acquired from CIA detainees and when. “Prior to, during, or after the detainee was subjected to the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques? If after, how long after?”

Yes, I know that some former Bush torture advocates claim that enhanced interrogation (a euphemism for torture) provided the key intelligence leading to Bin Laden. But it simply is not true. The Senate report had bipartisan support. If you talk to genuine experts who actually successfully interrogated terrorist suspects, like Ali Soufan, you would know what a crock of crap those CIA hacks are pushing. The truth about how we discovered the whereabouts of Bin Laden had more to do with intel provided by a Pakistani source who walked into the US Embassy and gave up critical details.

Morrell now has a problem. If he has the “proof” to back up his claim then he has to explain why he withheld this information from the Senate Intelligence Oversight Committee. You may have heard the old saying, “a fish dies by its mouth.” Looks like Morrell is going to have, to quote Ricky Riccardo, some splaining to do.

  • Popsmoke

    Speaking of Ali Soufan… A little off topic, but its a bullseye….

    http://www.soufangroup.com/briefs/details/?Article_Id=460

  • KenoshaMarge

    Why is it that so many people in Washington D.C. simply cannot keep their mouths shut? Seems Mr. Morrell wouldn’t be in trouble if he’d just kept quiet.

    He may not be accustomed to swimming in the shark infested waters of Washington and the media so why would he say something he knew not to be true? He doesn’t need to be politically savvy to know that one side or the other was going to stomp him flat.

    What’s that old saw?

    Better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

    Mark Twain

  • Retired_from_SPOnaj

    Why is it that even Gentleman’s Quarterly magazine has the story and Morrell doesn’t?

    http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201301/doctor-cia-blood-of-bin-laden-january-2013

    • Popsmoke

      Thats the real problem. GQ has the story…The story should have started with the attack from our base in Shang-ra-la….

  • foxyladi14

    Between a rock and a hard place.

  • MG6

    LJ if what the Egyptians are claiming then the CIA dropped the ball along with the FBI!

    http://www.investigativeproject.org/3869/egyptian-magazine-muslim-brotherhood-infiltrates