RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Economic/Market Highlights 12/01-12/05……”Abbie Normal”

Normal?? What’s that? Abnormal?? What’s that? Long term buyers? Who are they?? Isn’t the long term merely made up of a series of consecutive short terms? Oh, the headache of it all!! 

Is this entire economic tsunami the equivalent of the scene in Frankenstein where the good doctor asks Igor what the name of the brain was that he implanted into the young monster. Igor responds that it’s Abbie Normal. In a similar regard, is the government intervention into our capitalist system a plan intended to heal the patient but resulting in the creation of a monster instead? 

So much to address with so many issues and problems. Let me attempt to keep this relatively brief (I know…not my forte) with some outstanding links to pieces and stories on some of the higher profile stories of the day.

Our equity markets continue to gyrate within the same overall range as it looks for the next major piece of economic news, that is November’s unemployment report, to be released Friday morning at 8:30am. It is a foregone conclusion that the report is going to be ugly with expectations that the number of jobs lost in November exceeded 300k with the unemployment rate likely moving into the low 7% range. Anything better than those numbers will likely be discounted. We all know the rate is moving to at least 8%, perhaps 9% and hopefully not 10% or higher. 

Government bonds have continued to move higher in price, lower in rate as the market continues to expect both the Fed and Treasury to be determined in buying the long end of maturities in moving rates down. The Treasury has also launched an idea of having banks offer 4.5% fixed rate mortgages for new home purchases as a way of stimulating the housing market.  This is a good idea in principle but like most other programs the “unintended consequences” are problematic….

Read more as to how, the “MBS Market Skeptical About Plans.”

Oil closed below $44 a barrel, a new 5yr low. I thought commodities were turning the corner last week but that was another head fake. Most market soothsayers (especially those who are trying to sell you something) will make the compelling case as to how cheap the equity market is based on all valuations. “Suck it up, come on and buy something, here’s the bottom…” On and on it goes.

We have tried to make the case here at NQ that the game has changed because the model has changed. The days of “originate to distribute” on Wall St. have gone and will not be back soon if ever. That model provided for an extended period of “cheap” capital which fueled the equity engine. As the market comes to grip with the unwinding of positions purchased with borrowed money (that’s the definition of delevering) and a cost of capital that reflects where real money will take risk, the equity market loses that strong upside potential.

The manager of the largest bond fund in the world (and likely a reader of NQ, no doubt) offers his thoughts on this in his December 2008 Outlook.

I will quote Bill Gross as he offers “stocks are cheap when valued within the context of a finance based economy once dominated by leverage, cheap financing, and even lower corporate tax rates. That world, however, is in our past not our future. More regulation, lower leverage, higher taxes, and a lack of entrepreneurial testosterone are what we must get used to…..that and a government checkbook that allows for healing, but crowds the private sector into an awkward and less productive corner.”  I concur….perhaps Bill is a reader of NQ. Read his entire piece (it’s well worth it)…”Bill Gross’ Investment Outlook December 2008

Virtually the entire debt market remains closed to any new issue that is not explicitly government backed. This is NOT healthy. Even this week, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey tried to place 300mm in debt with NO buyers whatsoever. This is a municipal authority that generates regular cash flow from tolls and fares. The fact that they can’t place debt is a statement as to the mentality of the investing community. We have spent some time here highlighting that what has transpired in the 401 Ks of every reader on this site, much like what has occurred with every money manager, has not left the most unregulated and least transparent segment of the market unscathed. The “roach motels” that have masqueraded as hedge funds are also deeply into “THE PAIN CHAMBER”!!

Some of the largest and once thought of as the savviest hedge funds have ceased allowing redemptions and are establishing more “side accounts” for less liquid holdings. Citadel Holding was down 13% for November and 47% for the year. Fortress, a fund that went public at close to 20 traded up into the 30s is now trading at $2. DE Shaw, Farallon and more have ceased with redemptions.

I highlight these not to accentuate the agony but merely as an indication that they  all have positions and investments “overhanging” the market. That pressure keeps a lid on the market as it may attempt to rally and further pressures the downside. Read more here as to “Hedge Fund Withdrawals”            

D.E. Shaw, Farallon Restrict Withdrawals as Fund Freeze Deepens2008-12-04 03:14:54.300 GMTBy Saijel Kishan and Katherine Burton, Dec. 4 (Bloomberg) —

D.E. Shaw & Co. LP, the investment firm run by David Shaw, and Farallon Capital Management LLC Limited withdrawals by clients, joining more than 80 hedge-fund managers to impose restrictions in the past two months.   

D.E. Shaw, which oversees $36 billion, capped redemptions from its Composite and Oculus funds, said two people familiar with the New York-based company. Farallon, a $30 billion firm based in San Francisco, did the same with its biggest fund after investors asked to get back more than 25 percent of their money.   

The firms are two of the biggest to block withdrawals,known as putting up gates, so they aren’t forced to liquidate investments at distressed prices to raise cash. New York-based Fortress Investment Group LLC said yesterday it froze an $8billion fund after getting redemption requests for 40 percent of its assets. Tudor Investment Corp., the Greenwich, Connecticut,firm run by Paul Tudor Jones, locked the $10 billion BVI Global fund last week ahead of plans to split the fund into two.   

“There’s no longer the stigma associated with putting up gates or suspending redemptions as it was before this crisis,”said Jaeson Dubrovay, head of the $19 billion hedge-fund group at consulting firm NEPC LLC in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “It’s actually being encouraged by some large institutions as a way to protect longer-term investors from those who panic and redeem.”   

Darcy Bradbury, a spokeswoman for D.E. Shaw, and Steve Bruce, a Farallon spokesman, declined to comment.   

Industry assets peaked at $1.9 trillion in June, data compiled by Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research Inc. show. Investment losses and withdrawals may shrink that amount by 45 percent by the end of this month, according to estimates by analysts at Morgan Stanley.                     

Outperforming Peers   

The gate on D.E. Shaw’s Oculus fund was triggered after the company received redemption requests for more than 8 percent of assets, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is private. The fund, which tries to profit from global economic trends, is up about 10 percent this year,compared with the average 16.4 percent decline for the industry through October, Hedge Fund Research reported.   

Investors asked to redeem more than 6 percent of D.E. Shaw’s Composite fund, which pursues multiple investment strategies and has lost 4 percent.   

Even hedge funds that are outperforming peers have been hit by redemptions because they are a more ready source for cash for investors. Shaw, 57, started his firm in 1988 and has 1,600 employees worldwide. 

I told you that I would try to keep this brief so let me work at highlighting three other key points:

1. Auto Situation: I believe we will see a “prepackaged bankruptcy”. I do not think Congress has the votes, the determination, and certainly not the backing of the current administration. I think a prepackaged bankruptcy along with a heavy dose of government oversight will buy the auto industry some time and money.

2. The future??? Have we ever had a future economic outlook that has been this uncertain. I have tried to be consistent in promoting incentives for private capital (capital gains tax cuts, freezing tax rates, increased tax credits) to enter the market to facilitate the transferral of assets from weak (levered) hands to strong (unlevered, private) hands. Where are the leaders of industry when you really need them to pound the table on this front?

Meanwhile what do we get?? Barney Frank salivating over sweeping regulatory overhaul. Isn’t this the same Barney Frank who was “in bed” with Freddie and Fannie” and was willing to “roll the dice” in the sub-prime space. Excuse me while I puke…

Read more if you must, (pardon the expression, I do encourage you to read this)  “Frank Foresees Sweeping Regulatory Overhaul“.

3. Like any war, and make no exception, we are in the fight for our economic lives here, you need to know how you are going to get out. We have sung the praises here of Sheila Bair and once again, Sheila has the courage to highlight that for the long term economic health of our country and the world we need to be working on where and how we get the government out of our markets.

Read more, as to “Government Rescue Plan Needs Exit Strategy.”

Sorry, that was not as brief as I would have hoped but I do hope it is beneficial. “It’s Alive”!!!

LD                 

**The unemployment report today did reflect a loss of over 500k jobs for the month with a revised loss of app a further 100k job loss from October. This was the single largest job loss in over 30yrs. In a “sell the rumor, buy the news” scenario the overall market actually closed firmer by app 3% spurred by positive news form Hartford Insurance. We remain in the same overall range of the last two months … Have a nice weekend … LD***

  • Ron

    The jobless increase was 60% greater than expected and yet the stock market went up over 3%. What’s happening is that we’re gearing up for a Santa Claus rally next week. As with all such rallies in a bear market, it’ll be short lived, followed this time by tax loss selling and the usual end of month, end of quarter, end of year profit taking. What seems to be happening is we’re getting ready for the bottom to be convincingly set by early to mid-January. After that will be the beginning of the next bull market that’ll last for several years to come.

    It’s important not to confuse the stock market with the economy. The stock market will go up next year even as the economy continues to worsen. We’ve already seen the first signs of the disconnect. Tons of money are waiting on the sidelines for a signal that the market won’t go any lower and when that happens, the cash will come flowing into good, solid equities.

    Yes, more businesses will fail, banks will fail, unemployment will continue to rise for a while but stocks will move higher. That’s because the markets do not move in sync with the economy. They often precede the economy by 6 to 9 months. The economy should start showing signs of improvement by summer but the stock market will have already moved significantly higher than today’s levels.

    What we have here is an opportunity not seen since the 1982 recession. Take advantage of it if you can. These opportunities don’t come around too often in a lifetime.

    • LD

      Ron,

      I respect your opinion but I do not think that scenario will play out based on company’s inability to finance themselves with reasonably priced capital.

      That is not only Bill gross’ opinion but shared by many people with whom I speak.

      Why did the market trade up on Friday? Markets are always susceptible to vicious bear market rallies and bounces from short term oversold conditions.

      I respect your opinion but disagree.

      • Ron

        Companies that are in debt and need ongoing or continued financing will take much longer to recover or they will simply cease to exist. Companies without any debt and loaded with cash will continue to prosper and their stock will go up next year. One example is AAPL but there are lots of others.

        • LD

          I will grant you that but I do not think that that means the market as a whole is going up. I understand the time lag but I think that the economy will not turn until 2010 so the market may not improve until late 2009 and even then it may only improve marginally.

          How do we get the government out of the market?

          • WildChild

            You take away all limited liability laws.

            • LD

              Really? Care to enlighten us as to how that would work? I wish it were that easy.

              • WildChild

                Right now we live with this illusion called the free market. An entire fantasy has been created about it. An invisible hand regulates it. You can trust it because the self interest of the players will keep it working smoothly. Heh Heh Heh …and it’s all crap, for this reason. We have limited liability protections built into our corporate structures. It’s a giant safety net for the leaders in corporate America that protects them from having to take personal responsibility for their business decisions. There’s no down side for them. They can’t be hurt. Good or bad they walk away with whatever compensation they have accrued and its almost impossible to take it away from them. Which means it’s almost impossible for them to feel pain for their actions.

                If you want a truly free market, if you want self interest to act as that invisible hand we all keep hearing about then you have to get rid of the LLC and all it’s permutations. Only when a CEO is fully liable for his or her actions will self interest come into play. When they are looking at losing everything for them and their families to the point of being homeless and penny less and living under a bridge or having to move back in with mom… then they’ll think twice before doing some of the things they do. If they go down when the bubble breaks, there won’t be anymore bubbles. Then the people of the United States won’t have to use their government of the people to intervene in the private sector to keep our economy from collapsing and screwing the rest of us while the guys with the golden parachutes dance off into the sunset to a life a champaign dreams.

                • LD

                  I don’t know about that. I think we want to further promote an economy in which individuals take risk, albeit prudent risk and measured risk which can be properly monitored. I think we want the same result but I think we differ on the way to get there. Eliminating LLCs would likely lessen risk taking and that is not productive.

                  • WildChild

                    My argument was in response to your question. I disagree with it for your reasons. I actually want people to walk the cutting edge and push the limits of mankind in the universe. But a distinction needs to be made between risk taking and gaming. These bubbles are being caused by the latter rather then the former. Because of the limited downside the LLC provides, CEO’s of these multinational conglomerates are more then willing to lie through their teeth to all of us in pursuit of their next record profit. If they have to lie to us in their accounting or lie to us in their analysis or just lie to us with the bullshit hype we get about them and what they are doing, they’ll do it because they are not risking anything. They have their safety net. They don’t it for anybody else in our society but they surely want it for themselves.

                    I think if there is going to be a limited downside then there has to be a limited upside as well. With a safety net underneath you, you don’t get to make a hundred million unless you are the guy or gal that actually came up with the thing that was so new and unique that you could patent it. Simply collecting other companies through mergers and acquisitions will no longer be a valid excuse for the salaries these “captains of industry” (Bwah ha ha) make. That and after the IPO they should be required to buy back their shares within a certain time frame. The greed of the shareholder has become an excuse for all kinds bad decision making at the top. Implement these two things and we might actually get the greedy little cowards out of business and get the professionals in to replace them.

                    • WildChild

                      they don’t it for anybody else..

                    • WildChild

                      (frigging dyslexia) They don’t want it..

                    • LD

                      I appreciate the points you raise. Clearly the status quo is not an option. I am all for strict and robust restrictions and regulations. You hit the nail on the head in defining “risk” vs “gaming”.

                      Well said and I thank you.

                    • WildChild

                      It was a pleasure talking to you. :)

          • Ron

            I sure could easily be wrong but my guess is that the economy will start to improve by September. If Charles Nenner is right, the market will bottom next month. It may go lower than the Nov 20 lows or simply retest them.

            Here’s Nenner’s recent interview on CNBC:

            http://www.charlesnenner.com/inc_files/2008-12-02-cn-cnbc.wmv

            He and I may be wrong but it makes sense to be ready just in case. If there’s a Santa rally next week, I’ll sell some stock at a profit and be ready to buy when the market bottoms next month. We will all know the bottom when we see it. That’s when the doom & gloom crowd reaches fever pitch. Just be ready with some cash so you can jump in.

            Just don’t fall victim to the Santa rally. ;)

  • sowsear

    Isn’t Bair to be appointed to a post in the BO administration?

    • LD

      Unlikely as I believe Geithner does not like her.

  • Linda C.

    Ron
    I think you are having some Santa Claus thinking.

    Yes there are some opportunities out there, but I am not as optimistic as you are. We still have not hit bottom and the debt monsters are not going to go away. There are still only faint murmurs of the credit card debt in this country which exceed the total debt of some nations combined. This is not the 1982 Recession.

    • Ron

      This recession will be worse and longer than the 1982 recession but it’s still instructive.

      A Santa rally is just an opportunity to take some profits so the cash can be used to buy in when the market hits bottom.

  • MBC

    Buy what when the markets hit bottom?

    • Ron

      Buy good stocks with no debt exposure, loads of cash, and that are still thriving even in this recession. One example I mentioned above is AAPL. Apple is on its way to another record quarter. A new Apple store opened in Munich today. Care to guess what the reaction was? You don’t have to guess:

      http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/12/06/apples-munich-opening-is-mobbed-in-fullscreen-panorama/

      AAPL has no debt, $24.5b in cash, a trailing P/E of 17.54, and a forward P/E of 14.4. There are other strong companies out there that are holding up well. Just think of the companies you’ve heard about and go look them up. It pays to do some research.

      • LD

        Ron,

        I respect your opinions but the big question in this market is just what exactly will be the “E”. AAPl i smore than 50% off its highs. Impulse buying of consumer discretionary items are coming to a halt.

        I don’t disagree that the market will bottom during 2009 but I just think that it may drag along the bottom with very little bounce.

  • fiscalliberal

    Any thoughts on the bottom being 10% or 40% more.

    We know the Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds have had a redemption run. How do we know when that is over.

    Could it be a reduction in market swings?

    • Ron

      We’ll be at or near the bottom again when the S&P 500 hits 740 and the VIX hits 90.

  • fiscalliberal

    Good news is that after congress handed Paulson a blank check, It looks like they are not going to do that with auto. Auto tried the “sky is falling” but but got told, come back with a better plan.

    I also think they have buyers remorse with Paulson and they are being called back by Frank next week Wednesday.

    Some how auto has to down size production, both in volume and reduce product offerings to get overhead engineering costs down. From a customer perspective, I think the public is holding already to see who survives.

    We can lament Barney Frank pushing for more regualtion, but can we say that we should continue on with what we have. Not certain anybody will get back in other than the big money people

  • Steve_in_KC

    LD, I hope you are not too discouraged by the low quantity of responses to this article, or others. It appears to me that there are comments from people who understand everything you write very clearly. I am very impressed with the quality of the comments from readers!

    I don’t have the mind of an economist, and I’m sure that goes for a good percentage of our readers. Having said that, I am confident that we learn a lot by reading your pieces — we are just too far out of our depths to give intelligent feedback! Seriously!

    I hope you will keep the mindset of an educator and not allow a relatively small number of comments to deter you from continuing to help us understand what to most of us is unfathomable and deeply distressing.

    Just don’t scare the crap out of us! :P

    In other words, many of us can’t comment without exposing our ignorance on the subject! :)

    Keep up the exceptionally good work!

    • LD

      Steve,

      “Discouraged” is not and never has been in my vocabulary. Thanks for the feedback and the plug.

  • justsomeone

    comparing what’s going on now with some dinky recession is impossible for me to entertain. Face it, where we are now is unprecedented. The amount of debt individuals, corps & governments have assumed is scandalous. Thanks to the super clever now it’s all globally intertwined & contagious. Dwindling retirement portfolios/rising health care costs & taxes ought to inhibit the transfer of inherited wealth within the middle classes. I suspect stronger love affairs will grow between the uber rich & the growing hoards of global indigents. One of the hi lights in recent affairs, for me, were those 5 hedge fund managers kissing up to congress, just begging to pay more in taxes in return for a continuation of opaque secrecy as they pump & dump stocks & profit shorting them on their way down. Is that a free market? That’s a rigged market. Soros’ ideal of a “mixed economy” is already realty. Capitalism for them (the uber rich) & commie crumbs for the angry, fearful peons. To what end? Hell if I know, but it doesn’t sound like much fun to me. Hey, let’s over populate, pollute & devastate the planet & then try to rebuild wealth cleaning it up. What a plan. Bear in mind, the concept of a middle class is relatively new & could feasibly be hitting the dust bin soon. Here’s my prediction: a “sustained” fall rally in 09 followed by a BIG crash in 2010. Hope I’m wrong.

  • justsomeone

    LD, as for the Hartford rally…all based on it becoming a thrift & obtaining TARP $$$$$$. This is funny stuff. I say unwind the gordian knot. Bring back some form of Glass-Steagall. Separate commercial & investment banking, instead the exact opposite is being encouraged. I called a couple of banks Friday to inquire about their current CD rates & got a barrage of investment hard sells trying to steer me in risky directions. Insurers haven’t made their money in premiums in 25 years

    • LD

      Just….You make some interesting points. I appreciate your sharing them.

  • fiscalliberal

    With all this Federal spending, we know things are changing. An important parameter is going to be if Asia continues to support our deficit spending. I suspect that was the purpose of Paulson going to China to assess their interest in continuing their support.

    We need to be aware that China, in interviews is making noises on how the US needs to have some respect to their creditor nations. I translate that: forget any fair trade issues being addressed. So when any Senator like Debbie Stabenow starts yapping about fair trade, we might remind her about the impact of the debt.

    At some point this insane borrowing or printing money is going to bring on inflation. Greg Mankiew (economist like Krugman)is talking about strategies of targeting inflation. We need to start thinking about what our strategies as individuals will be.

    LD – that might be a subject for a separate post or broadcast.

    • LD

      Fiscal…Great idea. I will put some thought into that.

      LD

      Maybe I can address it during tonights’ show.

  • I’m a Linda too

    LD, thanks you for again another informative post.

    Maybe Bill was seeing WAAAYYY in to the future and that 5000 is yet to come?

    • LD

      Linda…I hope not. That said, we need to understand what is going on so we can prepare accordingly.

      Thanks for the plug.

  • Lizzy

    Excelent post. I have been reluctant to buy equities for a long time because they seemed overpriced Is there much chance that normal bank interest will come to a reasonable level.

    • LD

      Lizzy,

      When you write normal bank interest, do you mean “savings rates”? If so, I do not think so, those savings rates are closely linked to the Fed Funds rate which is now 1% and likely headed to an amenic level of .5% this month.

      That said, you can put your money into short term CDs at levels approaching 4% if you shop around. Even at that, I would encourage you to put your bank in competition by “shopping” a higher rate from another bank to them and see how your bank responds.

      Thanks for the plug.

  • Karma

    ‘Abbie Normal’….economic news delivered with a Young Frankenstein line…love it! One of the first things I read this morning.

    Please don’t be brief. Familiar topics or not. Every bit helps confirm or inform ideas I’ve had while hearing the reports.

    Thanks.