RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Republican Cocksuckers Part Deux

By Larry Johnson on August 28, 2007 at 1:20 AM in Current Affairs

by
Larry C Johnson

Sorry. Can’t help myself. Remember my recent piece, Are Republicans Cocksuckers? Well, looks like Senator Larry Craig wanted to get in on some of that hot man-on-man bathroom, anonymous sex action.

My point is simple. Folks who advocate strong anti-homosexual policies should not be dipping their wick in the same pond. The hypocrisy stinks. Personally, what two or more consenting adults do is none of my business. Guys like Larry Craig should mind his own damn business, stop moralizing about the evils of homosexuality, and just accept the fact that he is part of the community that he campaigns against. Is that so tough?

  • Delia

    What is it about Republicans and the gay thing? These closeted, hate-based types are drawn to flamboyant self-destruction like moths to flame. It seems like we’re up to about one a week now. One day in a distant, more tranquil time someone will write a fascinating psycho-history about these loons. Too bad none of us will be around to read it.

  • chris

    I was just talking about your original post, that it didn’t take long to add another hypocrite liar. I love the part of the story that says the plain clothes officer simply dropped his police ID on the floor in response and said, “your under arrest”.

    I don’t care what people do as consenting adults, but his record looks like Mark Foley and shows that the makeup is peeling off the face of the GOP harlot.

  • Montag

    It’s like the policy of intelligence agencies toward homosexuals. In the bad old days they’d just fire them on the pretext that a foreign agent could blackmail them into committing security breaches. Then they wised up and just insisted that the person come out of the closet with anyone who would give a hoot about it, so they couldn’t be blackmailed. The problem, from the agency’s standpoint, wasn’t homosexuality, but hidden homosexuality.

  • mudkitty

    Oh come on…the man just has, what he calls, “a wide stride…”

    Too rich.

    • http://www.liberaltopia.org RS Janes

      It was a “wide stance” — impossible for an average man wearing an average pair of pants to do a coded dance in the next stall, unless he had his pants off, which adds another dimension to this lurid tale of rank hypocrisy.

      You have to give Craig credit, though — according to reports he divided his ‘trolling’ time among public restrooms in airports, bus stations and train depots.

  • CK

    People with large brass balls often have a wide stride…or a chafing issue.

  • liberalbuffet

    Bloggers and others really need to go after people like MATT DRUGE, and expose these guys who are hiding in the GOP smear machine! I could care less if these people are gay, but they use their party and money to hide in the bowels of the so called “macho” part of the GOP. “Gay Old Party”!

    • http://www.liberaltopia.org RS Janes

      Matt Drudge, the gay best friend of Ann Coulter, the same Ann Coulter who referred to John Edwards as a ‘faggot.’

  • http://thumbsnap.com/v/78mn2yFc.jpg 1Watt

    I always remember this little item about Republican cocksuckers:

    http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/archive/oldnews2/boystown/

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ Leslie

    Sad.

  • Fred C. Dobbs

    It’s one thing to be a cocksucker.

    It’s quite another to be a SORRY cocksucker, which Sen. Craig appears to be.

    Not “sorry – regretful,” but, “sorry – as in useless and/or hypocritical.”

    Correct usage: “Those Republicans are some cocksuckers, but that Larry Craig is one Sorry Cocksucker.”

    This ends today’s lesson in Introductory Southernisms.

    TOMORROW’S LESSON:

    Is “piss ant” one, word, two words, or a hyphenated word? (see: A. Gonzales)

    ::::::::

    “American government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex.” – Frank Zappa

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ Leslie

    Senator Craig on Meet the Press January 24, 1999, Sunday 9:00 AM

    MR. RUSSERT: Larry Craig, would you want the last word from the Senate be an acquittal of the president and no censure?

    SEN. CRAIG: Well, I don’t know where the Senate’s going to be on that issue of an up or down vote on impeachment, but I will tell you that the Senate certainly can bring about a censure reslution and it’s a slap on the wrist. It’s a, “Bad boy, Bill Clinton. You’re a naughty boy.”

    The American people already know that Bill Clinton is a bad boy, a naughtyboy.

    I’m going to speak out for the citizens of my state, who in the majority think that Bill Clinton is probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy.

    The question issue now is simply this: Did he lie under oath? Did he perjure himself and did he obstruct justice? And that’s where we’re trying to go now in this truth-seeking process. And I hope we can get there. And then I’m going to have the chance to decide and vote up or down on those articles. After we’re through with this impeachment trial, it’s collapsed, it’s gone, then the Senate will make a decision on if it’s a censure or not.

    —————————-

    Meanwhile, Craig is blaming the Idaho Statesman for his behavior. And he’s never been gay! He was only playing footsies.

  • http://thumbsnap.com/v/78mn2yFc.jpg 1Watt
  • Centrocitta

    Many arn’t going to like this opinion but I’m making it anyway. While I do not condone Larry Craig’s political opinions, the GAY men in America are the ones who need to stop insisting that a man is Gay because he may have sought a sex act from a member of his own gender.

    The Senator is married. He has stated he’s not Gay and has never been Gay. He does not live with a man and has never lived with a man. But it’s almost as if Gay men are incensed by and jealous of the fact that the Senator can maintain a relationship with a woman while getting a little on the side from a homosexual.

    Let’s face it. Heterosexual men in many cultures have always taken advantage of Gay men. It’s just the nature of the beast but it doesn’t mean those men are in love. In ancient Rome, for example, the men distinguished themselves from the Greeks because the Romans were penetrators. They were NOT penetrated.

    Leave this man alone. Why should his career be ruined because the Gay community says so?

  • Delia

    Let’s face it. Heterosexual men in many cultures have always taken advantage of Gay men. It’s just the nature of the beast but it doesn’t mean those men are in love. In ancient Rome, for example, the men distinguished themselves from the Greeks because the Romans were penetrators. They were NOT penetrated.

    Whoa, Centrocitta. I’d say you have some serious denial issues there.