RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Here comes the “Czar” Word again

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A government “car czar” would oversee any bailout of U.S. automakers under proposed terms being negotiated by the White House and Congress for extending up to $17 billion in emergency loans that mainly aim to spare General Motors Corp and Chrysler LLC from bankruptcy.

I’m rolling my eyes here.

When all else fails, find somebody’s recycled friend, associate or relative, pay him a lot of taxpayer money, and call him a Czar. That will fix everything.

Basically, Czars are appointed whenever our elected officials are about to throw away big bucks to the anger of the Dirty Masses. Apparently, they think we will fall for the waste because there’s a Czar and Czars are serious things.

Remember the Drug Czar? Look how well that worked out for us.

Usually “Czar” is reserved by our inept elected officials for use with the words “War On”.

Now “War On” generally means, we can’t fix this so we will call it a War On. Remember the War On Poverty? Look how well that worked out for us. Then there’s the ongoing War On Terror. This is the most interesting War On of all. War on a feeling. Amazing, really. We might as well have a War On Dirt, because we continually declare War On things that won’t go away. Well at least they haven’t used War On in tandem with this gift loan to the Big Three. Yet.

But it’s time to hold onto your wallet again, because we are hearing the word Czar again. This means Big Bucks unaccounted for and more government employees to “Oversee” things. I wonder who Oversees the Overseers?

Once again, appointing a “Czar” is supposed to make us all feel good that we are about to give the Big Three money we don’t have. When you sift through all the typical Congressional Hot Air, we are basically about to pay the salaries and benefits of GM and Chrysler employees–until it runs out. Then they will be back for more and the “Czar” will highly recommend it. Then we will pay the salaries and benefits again.

In the meantime, small businesses are closing down at an astounding rate, but nobody is bothering with that.

This Big Three thing has a familiar ring to it. It seems they are making the same damned promises they made in the 70s and then again in the 80s. They didn’t mean it then either.

What you will only hear in whispers is the Big Three were in trouble long before Barney and Chris allowed Fannie and Freddie to irresponsibly tank without a warning to the tax payers. Long before. Their retiree payouts were officially bigger than their entire employee payroll. The snowball is getting bigger by the day, aided by an almost incomprehensible refusal of this country to realize that sticking businesses with the responsibility of health care forever is a major root cause for loss of jobs to other countries. We think that’s how it ought to be and the health insurance industry, which operates for stockholder profit via making decisions as to who lives or dies without conscience, is doing just fine. Why wouldn’t they? Nobody ever puts a foot on their throats as to their part in this mess either. If we don’t take this monkey off of businesses’ backs we can expect more of the same.

That’s not the only Doom story involved here. In whispers, there is also talk that the bill to force unionization of yet more companies is in the tank, waiting for Barack Obama. No more secret votes on whether or not to unionize. That should work out really well for us and guarantee yet another giant flushing sound of more jobs leaving America and more non-competitive businesses bolting their doors. We haven’t yet learned why the manufacturing sector wants none of this any longer.

I come from a family that owned a union company for many decades. Times were great. Everybody shared. There was an ass for every chair and a chair for every ass. Like I said, times were great and everybody did well. Times are not great right now. Either everybody sacrifices or nobody wins. It’s as simple as that. For all the talk of sacrifices already made by management and workers, the bottom line says it’s not enough and it’s not working. No rhetoric in the world is going to change that naked fact. This patch with money we don’t have is going to fall off in six months. And the Big Three will be right back where they are today. Their history demands it. All you have to do is read the Consumer Reports April Car issue for any particular year and look at the black circles in the repair records to know that very little has changed.

Then there’s management.

I don’t know how many of you remember Lee Iacocca when he begged for taxpayer money. We gave it to him and he rewarded us in return by pimping those lemon K Cars on TV:

”If you can find a better car at this price, buy it!”.

Here’s Lee in 1984. Sound familiar?

kcarAnd people believed him.

He was a hero.

There was even a grassroots call for Iacocca for President, even as he was sticking it up the collective butts of Americans with some of the crappiest cars ever produced.

I recall reading Iacocca’s book and a particular story about Henry Ford (I don’t know how many letters where after that particular Henry’s name). He said ole Henry kept wondering why he couldn’t get a hamburger as good as the one the chef in Ford’s executive dining room made. So Lee was having a bash and wanted to give Henry that hamburger. So he went to the executive chef and asked him how he made Henry’s hamburgers. The chef took a Prime NY State strip steak out of the cooler, ran it through a meat grinder and threw it on the grill.

Do you think that kind of behavior has changed at the Big Three?

Today, Chrysler is run by Bob Nardelli, the perpatual Jack Welch suck-up who left GE in a huff when he didn’t get the CEO replacement job. They fired him as CEO at Home Depot before he completely ran them into the ground, but not before they had to give him hundreds of millions of dollars in severance benefits. Today he runs Chrysler and now thinks he deserves billions of our money just because he drove to DC instead of using his personal jet. If he couldn’t keep Home Depot in the black, what makes us think he can fix Chrysler?

Buy American. Be Patriotic.

Hell, we all want to do that. But a car is a huge purchase. It’s not a toaster. It’s the second biggest purchase Middle Americans can make after buying a home. I don’t know about you, but I got screwed for the last time by American auto makers years ago. I kept giving them another chance and they kept giving me cars that let me down in every way imaginable. I don’t throw my money away like that any longer. I don’t believe them. Instead of attempting to make me feel guilty, they need to learn that it’s their job to convince me, and then it’s their job to prove themselves right. It is not my job to feel guilty for refusing to be screwed again. I wish I had all the money I flushed down the toilet for American cars I couldn’t wait to get rid of. There are far too many Americans who feel the way I do and unless and until American auto makers get the point, they will continue to play second fiddle to Toyota, which passed them two years ago as Number One.

A Car Czar can’t fix attitude. Post WWII, a mathematician named W. Edwards Deming warned America that if they didn’t mend their quality and efficiency ways, they might not be the manufacturing leader of the future. American car manufacturers snorted at him. To get the pest out of our hair, we sent him over to Japan to help clean up their mess. Everybody knew that “Made in Japan” was a joke. Deming stayed with them for 40 years. That’s how long it took for Japanese car manufacturers to eat our lunch while we slept. In the early 90s, when he was close to death and it was already too late, American auto manufacturers wanted him to come to their plants and fix them up in a few weeks. He laughed a lot. Patience has never been our virtue. No, a Car Czar can never fix attitude.

48-honda-civicConsider this: Honda produced the first Civic in 1972.

Many of them are still on the road. You could have bought your Honda ten years ago and people still won’t be able to tell what year it is. How come the K-car didn’t survive like the Honda did, except as a collector’s group novelty? Above is a ‘72 Honda Civic as shown today. Compare it to the K-Car shown above and let me know what you think.

Down the road, Toyotas and Hondas are made right here in America, crafted by the hands of American workers. Except they have been building the cars the Big Three have only talked about building for 30 years. They work on the concept that the person performing the next task is their internal customer. Thus, quality really IS Job One, not just a slogan. And they are paid well too. But there isn’t an ass for every chair and a chair for every ass. Job Descriptions don’t call for somebody to sit around because the job being done right now isn’t in their job description.

Consumer Reports also found that non-hybrid gas-sippers such as the Honda Fit, Scion xD, Smart ForTwo, and Toyota Yaris had few problems. Ford scored well for domestic car companies, but the top 10 most-reliable brands sold in America are all owned by Asian automakers.

I think 30 years is long enough to wait and I think that much of America no longer believes the Big Three. I don’t think America believes their management and I don’t think America believes the UAW either. Like the saying goes, this is deja vu all over again. We are bailing out these companies to keep the unemployment rate down. If they could compete well enough, we wouldn’t be bailing them out. So we are keeping them around so people can work and get paid. Where is the incentive in that?

American taxpayers do not want to be an employment agency. They already resent the bloated government payroll in a country where government is the number one sector for added jobs. Appointing another useless Czar isn’t going to convince them. They’ve Been There and they’ve Done That before.

  • lark

    Very good article, NQ. I said the same thing when I heard the word being used for that purpose. Worse. Czar now is gaining momentum. Soom the president will be called the Czar of the Administration and the CIC of the American people and Generalisimo of the Department of Defense.

  • http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com InsightAnalytical-GRL

    I’m sick of Czars! But there are so many around without the title!! Witness Tom Daschle, already out there on “healthcare reform.” The repeat of his Denver speech was on C-SPan last night…my mother said it sounded “good”—of course, I had just finished the piece on it that I’m linking to…and informed her that it was a lot of fancy words and part of a “sales job” in process now!

    If we had a real ELECTION CZAR who actually did what was supposed to be done, I might go for it…but now, we have too many fiefdoms and too many sub-czars…what we REALLY neede need a new term, I guess, what with Obama’s oligarchists entering the scene. The czars are even passe in Russia! Yes, how about “OLIGS” or something like that….

    “Healthcare Reform” PR Blitz, Screw Job on the Way–And YOU Can Join In!

    http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/healthcare-reform-screw-job-on-the-way-and-you-can-join-in/

  • SPalin

    Your analysis is so superficial that it is a joke. I am not sure what the point of this article is? Patching together a bunch of incoherent thoughts on a complex problem and industry that you clearly do not know anything about does not work. Write on something that you know something about.

    Another ridiculous superficial article on this website with very little insight and substance. This site should stick to Larry’s knowledge of international security and the CIA.

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      I am the author of this piece, which was accidentally posted under No Quarter. Thanks for your input, I promise to give it all the weight I think it deserves.

      In the meantime,I eagerly await your next published piece. I don’t seem to remember seeing any entries from you. Perhaps you could direct me to your perfect web site so that I might learn the art of not being superficial.

      P.S. Your comment was superficial.

      • Faustina

        I like Uppity Woman, but I think No Quarter overall is rapidly losing its credibility and helpfulness for TruthSeekers. Good-by No Quarter.

      • lark

        UW you said at the beginning of the article…

        I’m rolling my eyes here.

        These article is perfect. No need for anything more. Superficial or not, deep or not, does not make any difference. It is like the driver who goes 60 miles and hour on a 45 miles zone just to get 10 seconds ahead of me to the next traffic light.

        I am not watching more than a few seconds of news at the time. I don’t care anymore. Everything seem so irrelevant to me. Important news are not even carried. I turn to CNN and they gave 4 or 5 minutes to a 10 year old that supposedly wants to interview Obama. He he he, ha ha ha, nothing nothing who cares everywhere.

        I think NQ is an excellent place to be. Your article is outstanding. It can’t be better. If people want more they should write the article themselves so that it will have more. We need to live in today to understand what’s happening today. You provided an outstanding piece that explains today in no uncertain terms. Thanks for your article.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          You’re welcome Lark. And thank you.

      • Goofy

        Is the point of the article that there should be no role for government in the auto sector?

        or

        Appointing an auto czar for oversight is a waste of time?

        The government already plays a huge role in the auto sector. They have control over trade policy, fuel efficiency standards, state-governments give huge tax payer subsidies to foreign companies, healthcare policy, etc. So if you are saying there should be no role for government or no role for someone to coordinate the effort a little better, then that seems to be a little bit too simple minded.

        Of course no one is saying that government should be the solution, but they can play a better role in trying improve the auto sector with what they already control. The biggest blame should be with the auto sector itself, but since the taxpayer may give them money, a better coordinated government approach on the issues they already control probably makes some sense.

        • lark

          None of the above Goofy. She said…

          A Car Czar can’t fix attitude.

          The issue is the use of the word ‘Czar.’ The word defines the attitude of all stakeholders. It is clear from the wire service quote that the Czar dispensation is limited to the bailout. But we know that most here have implied that it will take instead a pervasive role of mandating on every little detail pertaining to auto sales. Why? Because the temper is about ‘getting the taxpayer investment paid back with some kind of interest.’ That means ‘control.’

          Control is the issue not only in this case but almost in every case and almost in every word we post here and is posted everywhere in everyplace you want to look. The issue in America today is ‘control’ and ‘controls.’ And so is the issue in our beloved enemy countries such as Russia and China and the rest. All people care is how to control others.

          All Uppity Woman is saying is that Iacocca used his controlling position to stiff the American people and that she has suffered under the deception of automakers’ controlling authority. That Honda instead opted to provide consumers a better product because they used less ‘controls’ and more caring.

          Czar = control. In today’s experience control is the worst form of way in which one can expect to obtain success. Success today comes from motivation. Motivation was what Palin was selling. We chose instead ‘to be told what to do’ which is what Obama does now in every damn interview he provides for us.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          Appointing an auto czar for oversight is a waste of time?

          Bailing them out is a waste of time. They have been blowing the same smoke and promises for thirty years. How many times do you have to be screwed before you no longer believe somebody? If this were YOUR PERSONAL money would you trust their words, given their history?

          • jvsp

            “How many times do you have to be screwed before you no longer believe somebody?”

            7 x 70 times for the common 0bot, which is almost too much to forgive.

          • Goofy

            In your article you do not do a very good job supporting why you think bailing out the auto industry is not a good idea.

            I am interested in knowing why you think bailing out the auto industry is not a good idea?

            1) do you not think the U.S. should have an auto industry or the large manufacturing base that it provides?

            2) do you think they can survive without a government bail-out?

            3) do you not think government loans and/or an equity stake will not work?

            4) do you think that lending money to the auto companies to get them through the current credit crisis is not the best means to help them? and say bankrupucy is a better alternative?

            5) are you not worried about the larger implications to the broader economy?

            6) do you think it is not a big problem that other countries are in the process of also bailing out their own auto sectors, so it is no big deal that the Big Three will be at a competitive disadvantage.

            7) do you have no problem giving big money to financial institutions, but when it comes to a manufacturing base it is a different story, or maybe you do not think the financial institutions should have gotten money either, so you really do not care about the larger implications to the economy.

            etc. etc. etc.

            Your logic is also flawed given that you seem to imply that lending money to the U.S. auto sector is only a zero-sum game and there is absolutely no benefit to it.

            If you are really going to comment on this highly complex topic you should be doing a cost-benefit analysis. What do you think it is going to cost the U.S. taxpayer if the auto sector is not granted a loan? What do you think the unemployment benefits costs alone are going to be? etc. etc. etc.

    • jvsp

      SP – perhaps you can elucidate us as to why exactly the above article shows a lack of understanding of the subject of which it treats? In what way is it ridiculous? What are these “complex problems”? Do explain. How did you come to these conclusions?

      [This is the part where you indignantly slough us off as "ignorant" by declaring it to be so, much as a Czar would do.]

      • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

        SP – perhaps you can elucidate us as to why exactly the above article shows a lack of understanding of the subject of which it treats? In what way is it ridiculous? What are these “complex problems”? Do explain. How did you come to these conclusions?

        Still waiting, eh?

  • benny

    War on dirt. lol.

    Lets get the heads of Honda, Toyota, Hyundai, Nissan to testify before Congress. Our big 3 have a lot to learn from other automakers. But they are so stuck in the past that they refuse to accept that their products and their organisational structure are obsolete. Add the mighty unions into the mix, and you got yourself one hell of a mess.

    A bailout to these id**ts is a waste of money. According to a survey, 61% oppose any bailout to these crooks. Thats a very high no. And now, nutty pelosi and terror bush are playing football with this issue.

    Declaring bankruptcy and restructuring the 3 organisations is more viable and cost-effective. If we give in to these bailout demands, you can be sure that the 3 crooks will be back in a year, hat in hand, begging for more.

    Those 3 have taken american ingenuity and creativity and buried it deep in the ground. R I P

    • tek

      We already had a car czar, didn’t work. What’s needed is for the big 3 to get innovative and start competing instead of always having their hands out to the taxpayers.

  • TexasMirth

    Czars,,,even the Russians got rid of them. Whenever I hear the word, I think of its root – Caesar, which doesn’t usually bring to mind Julius or Augustus, but more likely, Caligula or Nero. Of course, then I think of Rome burning, which reminds me of those loons in Washington D.C., sans the fiddler, who will probably show up for the four day Inaugural Bash fiddling away! And then, I’m back where I started – with Czars.

    • Paris

      The Czars are sort of, ok, are stupid.

      I see so much posing, but no skill whatsoever.

      I mean, when a guy like, oh, Putin, or Osama, can take down the Republicans, and the Democrats, well, it’s really saying something about the intellectual levels of our political parties.

      (And by that I mean those two characters seem to have it over Washington, intellectually, at the moment. )

  • oowawa

    Usually “Czar” is reserved by our inept elected officials for use with the words “War On”.

    Now “War On” generally means, we can’t fix this so we will call it a War On. . . . we continually declare War On things that won’t go away

    Very perceptive, NQ.

    “Czar” was the Russian word for “emperor” before the Revolution. It should have no place in an American Democracy. Don’t we already pay politicians with democratic sounding names like “senator” and “congressman” to run things? Don’t we already have a democratic system of government in place? It’s time to declare a War On Czars. A Car Czar? They’ve got to be kidding. And what then is the Mighty O–The Czar of All Czars? Or how about O-Czar–that has a majestic ring to it.

  • Goofy

    From the article you quote, which seems to be the basis of your article:

    “One leadership aide said both sides favored creation of a “car czar” role within the executive branch to oversee funds and ensure conditions were met.”

    If they are going to use government money to lend to the auto companies then what is wrong with having some oversight of taxpayers money??? What is the alternative to have no one paying attention to the money we have lent these guys?

    • oowawa

      Why can’t Congress provide the oversight? Is there something wrong with our system of government?

      • Goofy

        Well, that is exactly what congress would be doing by appointing someone to keep an eye on things.

        The author of the story above is tryinig create a bunch of drama. I don’t think anyone is talking about appointing a “czar” that has some kind of role in running these companies.

        If we had some better oversight into what was going on in the world of mortgage lending and financial derivatives maybe we would not be in this mess.

        In addition, there are many government related issues regarding the auto industry that made things more difficult for the auto sector. Trade policy, which allows the Koreans to ship 660,000 car into the U.S., but only allows the U.S. auto manufacturers to sell something like 5,000 cars into Korea. States like Alabama that give away everything and the kitchen sink through tax breaks, subsidizing new plants, and bashing unions for foreign companies, that could be working against the national interest and helped to result in the demise of the U.S. auto sector. There is a role for a more coordinated national policy on some of this. However, it is not clear if an auto “czar” would be involved in create a better national policy or would just be there for oversight.

        • Paris

          The author of the story above is tryinig create a bunch of drama. I don’t think anyone is talking about appointing a “czar” that has some kind of role in running these companies

          Can you kind of see where your PR methods fail, the attempts to discredit?

          This is where Obama’s whole operation fails, the unsophisticated troll attempts that cannot address content, instead assuming a type of intellectual superiority as both defense and offense.

          It’s laughable, and it’s why no one takes Obama, and by extension, the corporate PR model, seriously.

          It’s Jack in the box, it’s assembly line thinking. It failed Rove.

          Susan raised legitimate concerns, you failed to answer them.

          The only thing that stands out, to me, is you’re not capable, and that’s right.

          • Goofy

            Dude, your conspiracy theories are getting old!

            • Paris

              D0od, WTF are you talking about?

          • Paris

            Uppity raised legitimate concerns, corrected.

            And given Obama’s history of corruption, the last thing we need is another position by which politicians can steal taxpayer money.

            • Goofy

              You should move to Alaska!

            • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

              It’s not just Obama, Paris. We have a long long history of Czarship that didn’t amount to anything other than more expenditures. The real question is Who Oversees the Overseers? We need only to look to the FDA to recognize that we spend money for people to protect our interests only to find out that they are protecting the very people they should be protecting us from (See Don Rumsfeld and Asparame).

              How about that Czar by another title, who is supposed to be monitoring the safety of children’s toys for us? She had the audacity, after lead laden toys were discovered, to do a press conference and tell us how things are safer than ever. Of course, those need trips and perks she gets from China don’t affect her judgment at all.

              That’s just a short list of how our interests have been represented on tax payer money.

              Further up, someone said that Toyota and Honda should testify in congress. That person is SO right. I don’t know about the rest of the people here, but I have lived long enough to have listened to the same bullshit from the Big Three at least two other times. Given their history of failing to change, would you PERSONALLY bail them out if you had the money?

              • Goofy

                What?

                How did you get this soapbox?

                You may have gotten on this website because you may have been good at bashing and throwing mud at Obama, but you come up short when talking about economics and topics like the auto sector where you obviously do not have a clue.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          The only drama here is the Big Three coming to congress pulling the same bull they pulled in the 70s and again in the 80s. They “promised” to change those other two times too.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          The author of the story above is tryinig create a bunch of drama.

          Sorry, it wasn’t dull enough for you there, Goofy.

          • Goofy

            You should testify before congress, as your insight is astonding.

            All you are really saying is that you believe in small goverment and that the government should not help industries in this country at all, particularly the auto sector.

            Such a profound statement from someone who really has no idea about what is going on in the global auto industry and why they are in the position they are currently in. And from someone who also seems to have no concept of what is really going on with the economy of this country right now and has any concept of how important the auto sector is or what its failure could mean to the economy.

            Nobody likes the situation the auto sector is in, but to do nothing would be tragic and frankly makes no economic sense.

            By the way the last time the government helped Chrysler they made money.

    • jvsp

      “…lent…” LOL!

  • Baba Rum Raisin

    Back during Nixon/Ford’s and Reagan’s Recessions, my industry (homebuilding) was sucking wind pretty badly. When we asked for Relief (through an easing of the money supply) all we got from the Fed and D.C. in general was a hearty, “Tough Shitsky! And don’t forget to Vote Republican!!!”

    Now they want to subsidize the healthcare and pension benefits of UAW workers when I have to pay for mine cash, out of my pocket?

    Is there a WARM place in Canada?

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      Is there a WARM place in Canada?

      Sure! If you stay indoors!

    • tek

      Victoria Island, south of Vancouver.

  • Paris

    Given Obama’s relationship with Rezko, I would truly look to see how the money will be kicked back.

    Members of BOTH political parties are corrupt, it wouild be negligent, given IL and Washington history, not to watch this, very closely.

    The money belongs to the American taxpayer, not a select few.

  • Paris

    Given Obama’s relationship with Rezko, I would truly look to see how the money will be kicked back.

    Members of BOTH political parties are corrupt, it would be negligent, given IL and Washington history, not to watch this, very closely.

    The money belongs to the American taxpayer, not a select few.

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      It’s not even constitutional to be bailing out these companies. You either bail nobody out or you bail EVERYBODY out, including small businesses.

      • lark

        Exactly. Is either capitalism with its pains and anxiety and anguish or communism with its sweet daily dose of lollipops.

        • Goofy

          What a retarded comment.

          Nothing like living in a black and white world with no shades of grey. If only it was so simple.

      • Goofy

        What? Another example of your very simplistic logic.

  • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

    Well I got people fighting. It’s a good day.

  • lark

    Czar = ‘to be told what to do’ = Obama’s way as highlighted in each and every interview he gives.

    And yes, he himself said, ‘is going to get worse.’ Meaning he will tell us what to do more and more until it gets behind our brains that we need to hear it from him on what it is that we need to do today, tomorrow and about everything that concerns us.

    What I’m waiting today is to be told what to do from Obama. Maybe at 3:00 p.m. he will gives us a press conference with more advice from his majesty.

  • Doc99

    WHen has one of these so-called Czars solved anything? Anyone? Bueller?

  • Annie Oakley

    Dang, I’m surprised this piece was so controversial. I thought Uppity did a good job of pointing out these empty words that we’ve heard before. The use of appointing czars and having a war on _____ reminds me of Hope and Change. I’ve got a copy of a Dwight D. Eisenhower book published in 1954 called “Mandate for Change”. Some things never change, including the PR delusion that an appointment here or a hearing there makes substantive change.

    The automakers have had every advantage and managed to fail. I would prefer that others took over the task from here, especially if we’re going to subsidize them. A pox on the Big Three and the UAW. They’ve been part of the problem, too. The union helped defeat efficiency standards to make the more profitable SUVs. And why should working people who don’t have healthcare and pensions pay for the UAW’s? This bailout ball is just getting rolling. Next will be the states and municipalities.

  • beaming

    Chapter 11, that should work for everyone. Taxpayers don’t have to bailout folks that make more than they do [ we all know the average incomes by now ].

    Past behavior is a good indicator of future behavior.

    • TexasMirth

      Past behavior is a good indicator of future behavior.

      Oh, so true! Based on that truism, why do we keep electing Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, etc? The good news is that Louisiana voters finally ousted William Jefferson, so maybe there is hope that other districts in the country will vote out the rest of the criminals in Congress.

  • Phillymiss

    Has any one of the CEO’s the big three automakers offered to give back some of their outrageous salaries to help their ailing companies?

    I didn’t think so.

  • moonette

    I believe the president of Ford said he would work for $1 a year until the company was back on it’s feet.

  • mountainaires

    We now refer to our country as “THE HOMELAND!” We don’t call it the United States of America, or America, or the US, or the USA.

    Now, it’s “THE HOMELAND.”

    It’s positively Hitlerite.

    And, we call any head of a commission or a department or an investigation, “A CZAR!”

    Ferchrissakes, doesn’t anyone out there take offense at this but us?

    It’s godawful Orwell-Speak. You know, I sat and watched Orwell’s 1984 the other day. It’s fairly short, you can watch it on YouTube, and it’s chilling to see how much life these days resembles life in Orwell’s Oceana.

    Give it a shot. For those who’ve invoked it, but never actually watched it, you’ll be amazed at how far down the road we’ve already traveled. Particularly in London.

    Security at any cost has a price, ya know.

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

    Another great article Uppity Woman — taking a complex subject (and emotional subject for some) and using examples to simplify why the US car industry is so f**ked up.

    Movies have been made — books have been written.

    Now some politicians are going to cure the ills of the US auto industries by throwing US taxpayer money down the rat hole. (0zero’s use of “just words” Hope & Change — but recycle the same words aka “Czar”.)

    When we needed to replace our trusty Toyota I did research using two criteria — reliability and fuel efficient. Honda Civic. I did more research — Honda Civic. No US cars were found in the top models.

    Our last “built like a rock” Chevy truck — had the absolute worse quality control and workmanship on any vehicle — according to the mechanic who had to replace the engine block because of GROSS mis-drilling of the holes in the engine block. Once the engine block was exposed and naked — it took no special equipment to SEE that the engine block was never inspected. GM did nothing — and most of the guts of this truck had to be replaced because of GROSS lack of quality control. The left rear tire has blown (as in boom) 3 times — due to poor workmanship.

    All three car companies should be allowed to go bankrupt — and then merged into one car company under the leadership of someone who knows how to run a successful car company — knows how to hire people to make good reliable, efficient vehicles.

    No Czar — just bankruptcy. And I happen to know one of the Executive Officers for one of these car companies — a very nice man. But his company builds cars ready for the junk yard as soon as they roll of the assembly line.

  • Hot Librarian

    Wow – Uppity got SPalin Faustina annoyed. Goofy went beserk.

    Ok Goofy was already beserk.