[UPDATED] Barack Obama: “I Investigated Myself, and I Decided I Am Innocent”
By Truthteller on December 15, 2008 at 6:52 PM in Current Affairs
That is what I glean from an article entitled “Obama: Review shows no inappropriate contact”. I quote:
CHICAGO – President-elect Barack Obama said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement, and transition aides “did nothing inappropriate.”
In other words, Obama has mimicked George Bush’s behavior in the wake of the Bush administration’s bungled response to Hurricane Katrina: he will investigate himself and his staff, and he will decide whether he and his staff engaged in any misconduct. Bush was rightly and roundly criticized for deciding he would be the one to “investigate himself.” How odd it is that the chorus of government critics who raised their voices in 2005 is silent now that Barack Obama has decided that George Bush’s version of transparency is the model to follow. Does anyone seriously believe Obama’s attorney would claim Obama and his staff are guilty of engaging in inappropriate discussions with Governor Rod Blagojevich about the Senate seat Obama vacated? Does Obama believe we are that easily duped?
It gets better. I quote again:
Obama said he is prepared to make the review public, but decided to hold off because prosecutors asked for a delay and “I don’t want to interfere with an ongoing investigation.”
Transparency was and will remain a campaign promise. Any excuse, including that of an “ongoing investigation,” will be cited in order to shirk any form of accountability. Because the investigation of his office’s conduct is independent of the investigation of Patrick Fitzgerald, one would assume it would not interfere with the federal probe. After all, it was Obama who on Thursday stated the following:
I am confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deals related to this seat. I think the materials released by the U.S. attorney reflect that fact.
If he truly believed the documents Fitzgerald and the FBI issued last week confirmed he and his staff were in no way entangled with Blagojevich’s attempts to secure kickbacks for Obama’s vacant Senate seat, he would release information compiled by his attorney. For he and staff do not, if I may quote Obama, “have any part of the deals related to this seat.” I hope he clarifies this at his next news conference.
————————-
[UPDATED]: According to the article I cite, Fitzgerald confirmed his office asked Obama not to release the materials his attorney may or may not have compiled. This leads me to ask why an internal investigation of Obama’s office would interfere with Fitzgerald’s probe. Are members of Obama’s transition staff already under investigation? That a conflict would arise if evidence from an internal investigation that claims everyone is innocent was released reveals that there is more to what Obama discovered during the internal investigation than what he related to reporters today. Notice how he avoided answering questions about Rahm Emanuel.
———————-
Let us continue to read the article. I quote:
Controversy has swirled around the president-elect and his incoming White House chief of staff, Rep. Rahm Emanuel, following Blagojevich’s arrest last week on charges he schemed to trade Obama’s Senate seat for personal gain.
Obama, fielding questions at a news conference, sidestepped when asked whether Emanuel had spoken with aides to the governor.
Emanuel was one of several aides who watched the news conference from the wings.
Was Obama’s staff engaging in inappropriate conduct with Blagojevich or not? Why is Obama incapable of answering reporters’ questions about Rahm Emanuel’s confirmed conversations and written correspondences with Blagojevich’s Chief of Staff Mike Harris and the other operatives whose words are recorded in the Criminal Complaint filed by Special Agent of the FBI David Cain? Is Rahm Emanuel not Obama’s Chief of Staff? And why is Rahm Emanuel ducking reporters? Why is he present at a press conference when he is not answering reporters’ questions? Moreover, why is the President-elect who claims to be transparent unresponsive when asked about his Chief of Staff’s confirmed communications with Rod Blagojevich’s staff? What about the list of candidates Obama approved that was handled by Emanuel? Will Obama hold Emanuel accountable, or will Obama continue to instruct Emanuel to avoid reporters? Is this change in which those who desire transparency in government can believe? Or is opacity the new transparency?
Here is the penultimate paragraph of the news article:
The president-elect pledged the results of the investigation by his incoming White House counsel, Gregory Craig, would be released “in due course.”
What is “due course?” May we have a date? And why are we expected to believe that your future White House counsel, Gregory Craig, conducted a thorough investigation? Are we expected to simply believe you? And why is anyone expected to accept your pledge as sincere? Did you not renege pledge after pledge both during the primary and the general election? And how are we to take the investigation conducted by your future White House counsel seriously when we learn this in the final paragraph of the article?
He said the probe was complete and thorough, but did not say which of his aides Craig interviewed, whether any of them was under oath at the time, or any other details.
We have no idea if anything remotely resembling an investigation was conducted: so much for Obama’s intention to run an open and transparent government. Or maybe he will arbitrarily deem his secretive tactics transparent, and all the reporters and mindless drones who support him will stupidly nod their vacuous heads in slavish agreement.


















Pingback: Barack Obama: “I Investigated Myself, and I Decided I Am Innocent …
Pingback: Ms Placed Democrat » President Elect Obama Investigates Himself And Declares Himself “Innocent”
Pingback: 21: A Number Emanuel and Obama Will Remember on Fitzmas : NO QUARTER
Pingback: The Holidays may cause a few tummy aches for Sen. Obama. « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations