RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Bush Bombs at the United Nations

Certainly not an earth shattering headline, but disturbing nonetheless. The lack of love between George Bush and the United Nations is an old “dog-bites-man” story. Having put haters like John Bolton at the helm of the U.S. delegation, Bush’s in your face “go fuck yourself” hostility to all things UN is no secret.

But today’s performance in New York set a new low even for the Bush Administration. Except for tepid applause when Bush was introduced and when he left the podium, no one clapped. Not even our allies. The world has caught on to the George Bush propaganda game and declines to show him a modicum of respect.

Bush’s efforts to wrap himself in the aura of AIDS prevention, feeding hungry children, rescuing refugees in Darfur, and restoring freedom in Myanmar fell flat. There was a time when the United States could stand proudly before countries like Cuba, Myanmar, Sudan, and Iran and lecture them on human rights and democracy. But in the wake of Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, secret renditions and kidnappings of innocent Arab men, flaunting the UN Declarations on Human Rights, the creation of a million plus refugees in Iraq (and the deaths of hundreds of thousands), and the suspension of habeus corpus America has pissed away its credibility.

America’s moral authority is gone. Our credibility in talking about foreign threats and the need to respect human rights is zippo. What is truly appalling about this development is that we have aligned ourselves in practice with those very regimes we so vigorously condemn. In the past, authoritarian regimes like the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba, would justify their right to detain people without worrying about due process because they defined those individuals as terrorists who threatened the state and the security of their people. From their standpoint, all was fair when it came to protecting the nation. Security of the people was paramount, and human rights and civil liberties be damned in the face of perceived threats.

The Bush Administration, many in the U.S. Congress, and many Americans have willingly embraced the mindset and tactics of authoritarians and dictators. Hell, a large number celebrate the ability of a mythical TV character–Jack Bauer–to torture “enemies” in order to save the country. All is fair in love and war. But those are not the ideals that undergirded the American ideal in the wake of World War II.

So the world sat largely silently listening to a crazed little man rant about the abuses in the rest of the world. But his condemnation of the war in Sudan and the creation of refugees in Darfur could not blot out the reality of his war in Iraq and the millions who have fled that hell hole.

Bush declared:

Every civilized nation also has a responsibility to stand up for the people suffering under dictatorship,” the president said. “In Belarus, North Korea, Syria and Iran, brutal regimes deny their people the fundamental rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration” of the United Nations.

This was chutzpah. Just before Bush began speaking a series of car bombs swept Iraq killing and wounding hundreds. A country the United States has occupied for more than four years continues to be ravaged by violence. The Iraqi people themselves are denied the rights Bush extolled. Hell, the United States even protects mercenary armies–like Blackwater–who operate outside of any law and kill innocent civilians without any consequence.

The rest of the world sees and understands our hypocrisy. Unfortunately, many Americans share the ignorance and vacuity of George Bush and do not realize how foolish and stupid we look on the world stage. Today’s performance by George Bush does nothing to win friends or influence enemies. It simply reinforces the notion that the United States is in the grips of a President who has fulfilled the prophecy of H.L. Mencken:

” . . . all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most easily (and) adeptly
disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

  • http://aditya137.blogspot.com/ Aditya

    great summary Larry. How the hell do we stop this “downright moron” and his neocon and Likudnic handlers from starting World War III http://www.antiwar.com/orig/giraldi.php?articleid=11666
    as Philip Giraldi so starkly envisions it?

    • Bill Keyes

      IMPEACHMENT

      • http://www.ImpeachforPeace.org Mikael Rudolph
        • p.w.

          Don’t count on it.
          It appears the Democrats are more than happy to ride the wave of Republican suicide into the election, no matter the cost. It’ll probably backfire on them and give us another neo-con Prez, but since they’re raking in all the “contributions” from Blackwater and AIPAC they can hardly be bothered with logic.

          We need a plan B.

          • chris

            I know, we could blog ourselves to death.

            love

            PS. I support only impeachment…already two frogs jumped WH that should be marched out, AG and KR be thy names.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    I just posted this over at Daily Kos — it’s from the Foreign Policy editors’ blog, which also makes fun of the phonetic spellings inserted into Bush’s speech.

    Susan’s Note: One has to ask if PUNISHMENT is the only weapon in the Bush administration’s foreign policy arsenal. (Note to self: That’s a rhetorical question if there ever was one.)

    Cranking up the pain on Burma

    … [T]he main news in the speech was Bush’s call for economic sanctions against the leaders of Burma’s (very odious) military government “and their financial backers.” Bush also announced “an expanded visa ban on those responsible for the most egregious violations of human rights–as well as their family members.” The intent of all this is “peaceful change” in Burma.

    Can new sanctions on Burma be targeted so easily? I have my doubts. Economic issues are what drove Burma’s monks into the streets in the first place, and even the most carefully calibrated sanctions could hurt a lot of ordinary Burmese citizens. And with a crackdown looming, it doesn’t look like Burma’s general’s were impressed by Bush’s move. They’re betting that the United States, the United Nations, and the media will lose interest in this story. And they may well be right.

    • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

      P.S. Since I began taping BBC World News on BBCAmerica, I’m getting all kinds of news on my teevee I hadn’t seem much of before, including top-of-the-newscast reports on Myanmar, with fascinating, compelling video of the monks marching. (PBS Newshour also did a good report last night.)

  • MEP

    I’m 56 years old and since early adolescence, have always been an avid watcher of US politics and world events. During my life I have witnessed Nixon, Westmoreland, Thacther, Newt, Clinton, LBJ, Henry K, Ollie North,……..a long list of those who played fast and slick with the truth. “Do as I say, not as I do” is a phrase/mantra that those word smiths knew well. However, most that I listed were at least creative and intelligent with their damaging and sometimes murderous lies and deceptions. With his UN speech this morning, GWB has redefined dishonesty and hypocrisy.

  • Pingback: The SiteProphet found the internet (again)! » Bush Bombs at the United Nations-No One Clapped-Not Even Our Allies

  • mudkitty

    Bush bombs at the UN? I am shocked to the core.

  • ybnormal

    Larry, I love this post.

    America’s moral authority is gone. Our credibility in talking about foreign threats and the need to respect human rights is zippo. What is truly appalling about this development is that we have aligned ourselves in practice with those very regimes we so vigorously condemn.

    Presuming to have moral authority is what got us into this mess. Of course, the above quote is in the context of the sentence which follows it; i.e. credibility, respect etc. But in our current government policy context, true morality involves not assuming one has it to a level justifying imposing it on others by way of authority.

    The Bush Administration, many in the U.S. Congress, and many Americans have willingly embraced the mindset and tactics of authoritarians and dictators.

    How did this happen? I think we would all do well to realize that we are all capable of this to varying degrees, given enough fear, combined with enough personal conviction of rightness. To deny the possibility in ourselves is to open the door and let it in.

    Funny thing about that moral authority, as soon as one is convinced they have it, one finds it was never theirs to have in the first place.

  • anon

    It’s somehow unsurprising to me that George Bush might not have been wildly acclaimed at the UN today.

  • taters

    Brilliant, Larry.

  • joepauldad

    Outstanding, Mr Johnson.

    Keep up the great work!

  • J

    Larry,

    while bush nose dives at the u.n., his ‘girlfriend’ condi is also nose diving with the congress. she has lost her marbles and is now declaring that iraq corruption is a ‘state secret’.

    see:

    http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1497

    State Department Prohibits Officials from Discussing Iraqi Corruption

    The State Department has instructed its officials that they cannot communicate with the Committee about corruption in the Maliki government unless the Committee agrees to treat all information, including “broad statements/assessments,” as national security secrets. Other points of growing contention between the Committee and the State Department include Blackwater’s assertion that the State Department has instructed the company to withhold information from the Committee and the refusal of Secretary Rice to testify.

  • Luneylegume

    Bush bombing at the UN sounds so much better than his ordinary bombing .

  • http://noquarterusa.net/blog/ Leslie

    Well said Larry. Even Bush’s so-called support for issues such as HIV prevention is a joke too. Because the Bushies tie up monies for prevention to gagging planned parenthood efforts. Thousands of people are suffering and dying needlessly as a result. As for hungry children, Bush is about to veto legislation to provide children with healthcare in the US. Because his wars, and the war profiteers, need the money more. And how many hungry Iraqi children has Blackwater fed today, or Bush given asylum to in the US?

  • anon

    did you all notice that, just after the headline announcing that some Iranian people found their head of state’s treatment at Columbia and in the US to be outrageous, M.A. just gave a hardline speech declaring the nuclear issue “closed”?

    could it be that the way that M.A. was treated here gave him enough of a boost at home in Iran that he felt comfortable hardening his position wrt nuclear issues?

    if so, are we not already paying the price for having behaved like buffoons during his visit?

    • http://noquarterusa.net/blog/ Leslie

      You’re assuming that Ahmadinejad’s NYC visit precipitated the latter. But it didn’t. He’s made numerous similar statements.

      • anon

        Leslie – M.A. has previously said that the nuclear issue is “closed”, and that Iran will now ingnore all further resolutions coming from the West?

  • oldtree

    “DM” eng; “downright moron” term used to describe last president of United States, used “nukular weapons” (trash, see; white) on whales and killed planet……
    I would like to petition that this go in the vernacular as a synonym for the deciderer. Perhaps it will prevent the epitaph

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      I think, “dipshit,” covers it nicely.

  • readerOfTeaLeaves

    The Bush admin recognizes military and economic policy. How 18th century of them. Their economic views are rooted in Newtonian physics, by way of Adam Smith’s ‘Wealth of Nations’ which was published in 1776: ‘market equilibrium’ will be achieved by ‘perfect pricing’ and thus all things will be in harmony. Back before the steamship, food canning, the telegraph, or even the simply #2 pencil were invented.

    Their failure to recognize the power of trust, the value of respect, or the wealth created by social capital is almost stupifying to watch.

    They are a cautionary tale, but the lesson are far, far to expensive. Will re-read later; couldn’t take it all in the first time out.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/ SusanUnPC

    FYI, C-Span2 is now playing Bush’s speech — just starting.

  • Gypsy

    I always try to play the Devil’s advocate yet for the life of me the evidence always leads me to the same conclusions and that is with cronyism, profiteering, power grabing and delusional thinking, Bush has no credibility left with me or most of American and a large majority of the World. More’s the pity. We all must keep chipping away at the 30% who are still delusional but if they can’t see the light then it is up to us to bring about change anyway.

    • Bill Keyes

      Comment by Gypsy | 2007-09-25 20:26:40

      “We all must keep chipping away at the 30% who are still delusional but if they can’t see the light then it is up to us to bring about change anyway.”

      I agree, but one thing I would like to point out is while 70% of the populace supposedly doesn’t approve of Bush, a large percentage of those people (who are supposedly Democrats) have about as much of a clue what Bush is doing as the other 30% who are “blinded by the “light” of right wing radio and Faux news. Many of my close friends who I send info daily still really don’t believe things are bad enough to justify impeachment or they just say “I’m never going to vote again or “all politicians are crooks, etc” and then go back to there ordinary lives.

      So I’m afraid that in this case numbers do lie because I would say that less than half of that 70% of those who disapprove of the Bush regime are really active like those of us who post here and elsewhere.

      Another point if that 70% really transformed into the political arena
      then the Democrats would easily be able to over ride a veto and Bushco would be stopped dead in its tracks.

      Don’t get me wrong I am not trying to throw water on your enthusiasm, I am just trying to be realistic in saying that as long the 30% Republican sheeple and half of our so called Democrats are not really affected by what Bushco has done most of our efforts are frankly going to be in vain, unlees we all scream daily for IMPEACHMENT.

      If all 70% of us were yelling daily for impeachment I guarantee it would be “on the table”. But not many of us who are yelling are. I don’t see a lot of people posting here saying “Impeach now”. So since there isn’t a unified voice for “impeachment”, the spineless Dems aren’t going to do didly sguat. All they are interested in is getting control of the WH house in Jan 2009.

      Between now and then hundreds more “US Troops” and thousands of Iraqi’s will die and billions will be wasted, so if your attitude is lets wait until the Dems get in and then there will be hell to pay, good luck.

      If Hillary is the next President great, how much has she said about reversing all the crap the Bush cabal has done for the last 6+years?

      Hmmmmm?? Not much so what do we gain by waiting for her?

      Anyway as I have posted here and elsewhere Rudy Guilliani WILL BE THE NEXT POTUS.

      Want my reasoning for this?

      I won’t waste more time here.

      Email me at bill564@cox.net and I tell you however I bet I won’t get any takers.

      • MEP

        For Bill Keyes

        ITMFA

      • Gypsy

        Bill,
        Unfortunately I think you are right, Hillary won’t give back all that power. Chris Dodd has said he would restore the Constitution and I believe Dennis Kocinich would too but they don’t stand a chance. I do not believe that Rudy will be the next POTUS. If he is then we should all just bend over and kiss our ass goodbye. He would be an even more authoritarian President than Cheney is. His wierd factor just multiplied by a factor of 5 with his phone call from Judith during the NRA speech and then his $9.11 fund raiser. Doe’s this guy ever miss an opportunity to exploit 911? In front of the NRA, I think he just came across as WHIPPED.

        I have Republican friends who are ready to quit voting and move to Saudi Arabia to work to avoid their children being drafted eventually, (not sure why they would want to move to such a represive place). I don’t think they have thought that one out. My neighbor says that everyone is talking about how disturbed they are and when I try to tell her how bad it really is she just says that she can’t handle it just tell her who to vote for. That is amazing to me. You are so right about the mediocrity of the thinking of the American people.

        What is worse is the more that the Dem’s look like they have Stockholm syndrome, the worse option they seem to be but they just can’t seem to figure out how to get the PR right and then grow a spine and take them on. I am having a hard time hoping they will win if they can’t even win a battle where the country is with them. So what do we do? I was in San Francisco a week ago and went to the Federal Building on Sunday to protest with the ENOUGH, IMPEACH crowd and there was only one brave man there. I brought 3 others with me. They did have a group at the Golden Gate Bridge the day before who layed on the ground to spell out Impeach Bush but then again the media won’t cover it so who knows what is happening. There is no real organization yet even though I do think there is even bi partisan support for it if you listen to people like Bruce Fein and John Paul Craig. So where does that leave us? Is America asleep like Germany in the 30′s as danger grows or are these people just harmless and trying to protect America? I would really love to think that they are harmless but they seem to be amassing power in a very systematic way and while I understand that they believe in a strong President, I also see the abuse and lack of real oversight. It is time the Democrats in Congress and the Senate push the Contempt of Congress charges and have a real show down. That might get the attention of the country. Well if Brittany Spears or Paris Hilton don’t get another DWI. I am constantly amazed at how easily the people are distracted by the objects which have no bearing on their quality of life, even as they ignore all that does.

        Well, I have to go and listen to the media about Burma, Who knew we cared? I am glad Bush told us and the media dutifully followed the lead.

  • Jess Wonderin

    Well said Larry-

    OMFG!!!! Decider Guy rolls in town to tell the World to stand up for human rights, world health and people’s right to self determination . . . kinda like Vic giving a speech before the SPCA on proper care and feeding of dogs . . .

    And please explain WHY he bothered to show up ONLY for the Dinner AFTER the UN Global Warming day long workshop??? America . . . World Leader! It’s gonna take YEARS to get the stink of bullshit out of our Government . . .

    • anon

      No kidding, he only showed up for the free dinner at the end? What a cheese! Where I come from, we call that “low class”.

  • Pingback: Impeach Bush For Peace » Bush, Ahmadinejad vie for most reviled at UN

  • Bill Keyes

    Speaking of Bush Bombing……

    Check out this article…

    What World War III May Look Like by Philip Giraldi

    http://www.antiwar.com/orig/giraldi.php?articleid=11666

  • Toad Jones

    The sad reality is when Americans try to arrogantly boast to the rest of the world how America is the world’s bastion of freedom- it evokes laughter, and eye rolls. And of course, such flag waving pod people react to such laughter with threats of violence…

    The land of freedom is dead folks- the Republicans are proto fascist, the Democrats are eunichs…
    The founding fathers would advocate an armed overthrow of the goverment at this point-but somehow the act of dissent (upon which this nation was created) has been labled unAmerican.

    Revolution will never happen- even when the day comes when we are sent off to Death…I mean ‘Freedom Camps, citizens will blindly be obeying authority as they are being shoveled into ovens…

    Im glad Bush’s speech was a flop- pitty he wasn’t booed…

  • http://freerange-fillip.blogspot.com/ epppie

    I’m surprised Bush didn’t start pounding on the podium with a shoe.

    Oh – that would have taken an actual sense of humor…

  • prostratedragon

    I’ve been following Bush’s UN reception diminuendo with interest for a few years. It takes a real body of diplomats to applaud so delicately.

    If he’s around for next year’s summit, the Zen masters might get material for a new riddle.

  • Pingback: All Spin Zone » How Do You Spell That?

  • pro choice lib

    Wait. I thought Bush supporters wanted the United Nations Bombed? Oh….wrong bomb. My bad.

  • Philip Henika

    By now, at least one global leader should have proposed a multifactorial ‘global peacebuilding initiative’ resolution at the UN – an initiative which addresses the end of war; the adaptation to climate change; alternative energy in lieu of the peak oil hypothesis, the end of pandemics and use of computers i.e. advanced modeling and multivariate statistics.

    I cannot recall a feeling of global unity with a sense of purpose and not the overreaction we are seeing post 9/11. The movie documentary “In the Shadow of the Moon” has been lauded for its reminder of world concern about the safe return of the Apollo astronauts. In the movie Independence Day, the world unified under the extraterrestial threat of its demise.

    Why does Bush hate the UN?

    Because a UN global peacebuilding initiative would end his abuse of the industrial/military complex ala the warnings of Dwight Einsenhower.

  • lidia

    “There was a time when the United States could stand proudly before countries like Cuba, Myanmar, Sudan, and Iran and lecture them on human rights and democracy.”

    Hm , I do not want to sound rude, but WHEN exactly USA could do it? While genociding Natives? While enslaving Blacks? While colonising Cuba? While enforcing Jim Crow laws? While lyniching? While supporting Russian contrrevolution? While planning to a-bomb USSR? While one more time attacking Cuba? While toppling Aliende? While bombing Iraq (no, not in Bush-jr, time),while bombing Yugoslavia? While supporting Israel against Lebanon and Palestinans (one more time, not in Bush-jr. time)?

    BFORE Abu-Graib USA’s mentors taught how to torture, and some people even know about it :(

    In short, I am affraid all the history of USA does NOT looks SO good from outside, sorry.

  • Montag

    Reminds me of Mad Magazine’s satirical take on the 70s movie, “Dirty Harry,” about a rogue cop who wasn’t much on constitutional rights. When Harry tortures a suspect into revealing the location of the girl he’d kidnapped, the courts let the crud go. In Mad’s take Harry’s superior says, “These are the principles that made America Great.”

    Harry replies, “Yeah? Well me and the audience just decided that we prefer the principles that made NAZI GERMANY great!”

  • Pingback: The mullenkin.com found the internet (again)! » Archive » Bush Bombs at the United Nations-No One Clapped-Not Even Our Allies

  • http://dsafeafd Jessica

    aewdsa saf wefrasf adsf sdaf