RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Economic/Market Highlights..12/16…”Follow the Money!!”

Whether one is on Wall St. or Main St., in politics or in business, acting legally or illegally, if you truly want to get to the bottom of almost every issue, there is one simple rule, “follow the money”!!

Sometimes the path will be short and easy; sometimes it will be long and circuitous. During my 25+ yr. career in business, I have NEVER seen so many fascinating “paths” as I do today. Pack lightly and let’s “move out”!

The equity markets rallied today 4 to 5% on the heels of a cut in the Fed Funds rate of .75 to 1% leaving the FF rate in a range of 0 to .25%. The size and delivery of the move did catch the market by surprise and prompted the move up in equities. This move could have been prompted by a 19% drop in housing starts signifying that housing is still a long way from being out of the woods. I offer the following comments and analysis:


1. This move is an indication by the Fed that the economy has weakened considerably even since the last move in November.

2. The Fed indicated that they will leave the FF rate in this range for an extended period. I mean they are basically saying to the banking community , PLEASE take our money and go use it.

3. The Fed now has NO more monetary policy ammo in the quiver. A reader asked me earlier today to comment on the potential for a “quantitative easing” by the Fed. We addressed this possibility, without using that wording as a strong likelihood in our piece last Thursday (“It’s Easy to Find Fault…”).

The Fed will almost assuredly balloon its balance sheet by issuing debt (typically handled strictly by Treasury) for the purposes of purchasing mortgage assets, consumer finance assets, commercial mortgage assets, and who knows perhaps corporate credit assets as well. If consumers and corporations can’t or won’t further “leverage” themselves, then Uncle Sam will do it for them (but isn’t Uncle Sam’s money OUR money and that of future generations??).

4. This is great, right…??!! The equity markets rally 4-5%, government bonds of longer maturities drop 20 basis points (.2 %) …everything is good again, right??

5. I view this drop in the FF rate as primarily a move to quicken the healing of bank balance sheets, and yes that would be a good development.

6. Underneath the surface, though, what the Fed is doing is risking future inflation against the prospects of even further weakening in the economy. This is a very dangerous game. Our U.S. Dollar got hit hard today. We just had the biggest 5 day drop in the value of the U.S. dollar vs the Euro since the Euro was launched in 1999. The dollar also weakened considerably vs the Japanese yen.

7. While equities firmed, (for my money it was a short covering rally in the context of a bear market…on the month equities are now up 1-1.5%), we did not see much of a move in commodities today with the exception of gold. Gold was up another 2.5 to 3% while oil was down (this despite an expected cut in production tomorrow by OPEC of 2-3mm barrels a day).

If the markets today rallied because they thought the economy was turning, I think you would have seen this reflected in the prices of commodities and metals primarily moving up significantly.

8. Who’s the boogeyman in the room? Even though the Consumer Price Index dropped 1.7% for the month of November, the core rate (which excludes the very volatile food and energy components) was flat. That core rate indicates to me that we are not experiencing disinflation (a slower pace of inflation) or deflation (an outright drop in prices).

With the decline in the dollar, and gold moving higher I think there are real longer term inflationary concerns. People may say that the Fed can raise rates when they see that happening. Easier said than done. One of the greatest variables in inflation is the mere “expectation of inflation” which causes producers to increase prices. LET’S WATCH THIS CLOSELY!!

9. The Fed did comment that “it is tougher to to aid state and local governments.” While government bond rates and mortgage rates moved down, rates on municipal bonds actually moved up a touch.

There’s a fork in the road…let’s take it.

How Bernie “Madoff” with 50Billion!!

In reviewing investor’s statements and Bernie’s books, he maintained two sets of books. Bernie clearly lost money trading but who knows how much. He certainly did not actively trade options despite what he promoted. How do we know this?

Bernie’s supposed strategy was to buy large cap stocks and simultaneously “hedge” them by selling calls and buying puts. That strategy is consistent with running on a treadmill. You may work hard but there is a very strong likelihood you will end up right where you started and probably worn out in the process.

Investor statements showed monthly trading activity but no positions at the end of each month as Bernie supposedly closed out his positions by the end of each month. That is highly suspect in and of itself, but if Bernie were trading options vs these equity positions he would have been the largest options player BY FAR in the market and multiplied the volume of options traded by a large measure. Even if he traded these options in the “over the counter” market vs “on the exchange” his activity would have moved the market. It just did not happen.

This begs the question. If Bernie was not actively trading then he was not LOSING money in that activity. Where did the money go?? Obviously some went to repay investors looking for some redemptions. Some may have gone to run his operations at BMIS. Who knows how much went into his lifestyle. All that said, though, given the size of this scheme I have to believe that he was funneling it or directing it elsewhere. Did Bernie have outside interests that he was financing??

Follow the money!! We shall see. Stay tuned!

SEC chair Chris Cox admits that the SEC “had multiple failures” in its investigations of Madoff’s business, Read more in “SEC to Probe Its Ties to Madoff”…

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122947343148212337.html?mod=testMod

Follow the money…………..!!

Personal Finance
For those looking for mortgage money with little to no down payment I read today how fixed rate mortgages are being offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These mortgages are geared to people in more rural communities, but that seems to be a relative term. We are trying to be responsible here at NQ, so income verification and credit checks are part of this process.

Two consumer surveys indicated that consumers would purchase autos from companies that had declared bankruptcy. We concur. Guarantee the warranties and price the vehicles to sell and they’ll move!!

Time to Make Camp…..

Other stories in the near future will address the following:

1. stimulus package
2. reputation risk
3. any suggestions that you may have that you would want investigated…don’t be bashful.

LD

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

    Follow the money — yep that’s what I’d like to see done with Obama’s source of campaign funds. Who or what group would fund the campaign of an unqualified and inexperienced individual?

    We’ve heard Soros name — but who are the others.

    My guess the the individuals who are betting on a depression or massive recession are the ones who are backing Obama.

    what I find strange is that the banks are hording the cash they got from the Feds — why? The money was supposed to be used to loan to business.

    This reminds me of Ray-gun’s trickle down economics — giving it to the wealthy was supposed to trickle down to the not so wealthy — THAT never happened.

    Wake me up when this mass nightmare ends.

  • Linda C.

    If oil does not move up despite the cut in production and the devalue of the dollar, what is the real possibility that OPEC will move to Euros? Forty dollars a barrel from 140 dollars a barrel with money that is now worth less than it was 6 months ago is not going to sit well with OPEC.

    I think it is more that corporations and consumers can’t get credit versus “won’t get credit. Interest rate on credit cards is going up despite people’s credit rating..therefore they are not going to use the credit. Mortgage rates will come down, but how many people qualify? If the banks are going to charge usury rates despite the cheap money they are getting or simply refusing to lend, then why are we bothering with it anyway? If the Feds are going to buy up the debt and still have almost free money going around to the banks, I don’t see the point.

  • http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/ Not your Sweetie
  • Linda C.

    the banks are hoarding their cash to cover their future losses with the long painful process of “write downs” from the sub prime mortgage meltdown and other “get rich quick” schemes. Unfortunately, their actions of hoarding their cash is only making it happen. The banks are stuffing our money in their mattress

  • getfitnow

    Once again, thanks LD. I look forward to your articles more than ever. Please don’t go away. We need you here.

  • LD

    NW Rain, …don’t overlook the fact that while banks have taken capital in, in order to lend you need entities that WANT to borrow. We have issues on both ends of the pipeline.

  • LD

    Not sure what this has to do with the economy/markets but…thanks for sharing…

  • LD

    My pleasure. Thanks for the plug…and spread the word!!

  • LD

    Linda….why are they doing this?? Their need to replenish their capital base from the imprudent lending over the last 5 yrs. Those loans will continue to see exorbitant levels of delinquencies and defaults.

    The market knows this which is why the “securitization” of thes loans has shut down.

    The market is acting in a totally rational and consistent fashion, albeit a very painful one for all involved.

  • AnnieO

    Any real talk about those 4.5% mortgages yet?

  • fiscalliberal

    LD – did you see the article about the Fed setting up a company which then purchased Resedential Securities from AIG. I do not understand this propensity to help AIG so much. I support bankrupcy for auto to clear the books and move on. However I think there is a legitimate discussion in terms of bailing out financials versus industry. In the end, financials do not make real things.

    Would you agree that Monetary policy has given what it can to resolve the problem and Fiscal policy needs to step in. Hopefully it can be done in a manner to stimulate the markets. That would be firming up infrastructure to allow industry to work.

  • LD

    Still being discussed as part of this “quantitative easing”. I think the Fed and Treasury hope that the mortgage rate moves to that level as they buy up mortgage securities along with treasuries in the secondary market.

  • lark

    Good article. I agree in summary with your point number 6. What cost nothing is worthless. We may be opening the door to the total devaluation of America. Devaluation that may trigger triple digit inflation a la Argentina, Zimbabwe, etc. We are not playing with fire. We are playing with scorching earth blazes. I think we are now acting stupid. As I write this I feel very uneasy. It is not right to make the entire financial system a paradox in and of itself.

  • LD

    Fiscal,

    The Fed has had a money management firm, Blackrock, take over the management of AIG’s mortgage holdings. blackrock has a very good reputation in the business with tremendous analytics and risk systems. That said, they are not magicians, and can’t stabilize the prices in that sector simply by “hoping and praying”.

    It was speculated this morning that AIG’s “mismarks” on a wide array of positions is another 30bln. AIG discounted that report, but I believe it as it is indicative of the laarge embedded losses there. AIG is trying to sell divisions around the world to raise capital to write down these losses but are finding few if any bidders for those businesses currently.

    The government continues to inject capital into AIG for the simple reason of the “massive systemic risk” that would occur if they went down. Heck, they are already are down, it is merely the governmetn writing checks to make them appear to be alive. (Sounds like that movie, “Weekend at Bernie’s). Who is on the other side of all of AIG’s exposure? All of the Wall St. banks, especially Goldman Sachs.

    From the governmental standpoint, fiscal policy and these quantitative easing measures are the next moves.

    I am still very much of the mind, though, that the biggest bang for the buck would be a cut in the cpaital gains tax. We need private capital to enter the market adn that would be the best vehicle for making it happen. Regrettably, that concept seems to be getting no air time in Washington.

    I am going to address this stimulus topic within the next few days.

    Thanks for writing.

  • Mercedes

    It looks like most of the commenters understand the financial world. I don’t, but I do understand this comment,

    “Did Bernie have outside interests that he was financing??”

    It is also interesting to me that the authorities caught up with this big contributer to the Democratic Party on the eve of the Republican’s departure. The timing of this whole financial fiasco is more interesting to me than anything.

  • LD

    Lark,

    Bernanke is a student of the Depression and I think he feels that we have to “release the flying monkeys” (remember that scene from the Wizard of Oz?.

    Once those “monkeys are released”, can we control them and the consequences?

    Very dangerous game and extremely high stakes. They are going “all in”.

    Thanks for the plug.

  • lark

    The timing tells a story in and of itself. There is so much corruption everywhere everywhere.

  • fiscalliberal

    Mercedes – It sure looks suspiciaous. However my take on it is greed (speculation) and incompetence (fund managers recommending Madow). The George Bush lack of comprehension and Greenspan Ayn Rand ideology has a lot to do with the current business collaps

  • LD

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122945517473311217.html

    hope you can access this story on this Danish “fraud”…these individuals need to be punished VERY severely…I have no problem giving them life in prison…

  • justsomeone

    LD, the equity markets may “like” the rate cut, however I just peeked at several bank stocks & they’re all down. Please tell us if you think the FDIC will continue it’s expanded coverage beyond Dec 2009

  • LD

    Just….I have a very hard time believing that the FDIC would retract from that increased coverage level. The initial 100k level was established a long time ago and had never been adjusted. The fact that the Fed has indicated that they will leave the ff rate low (0 to .25%) for an extended period tells me that they know the banks need to be recapitalized. Dropping the insurance coverage will strictly cause depositors to withdraw funds. It would be a self-defeating move.

  • fiscalliberal

    LD – I was thinking of this company:

    The residential mortgage-backed securities were sold to Maiden Lane II LLC, a newly formed firm owned by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Which I found in this Dow Jones news story

    AIG Sells $39 Billion Securities Stake to Settle Lending Transactions

    Either Blackrock did not do a good job or something happened as this is a new firm

    Other Topic

    I heard they yanked the passport of Bernie Madows wife. Could be she was going abroad to claim the rummored billion he has stashed away.

  • LD

    Fiscal,

    I am almost certan that this entity was established by the Fed to “house or hold” the purchase of some toxic assets. The Fed actually purchased these CDOs from Wall St. banks that had insurance on them written by AIG. In purchasing these assets it effectively allowed AIG to unwind those insurance contracts that were continuing to decline in value and thus force them to put up more capital.

    The Wall st. banks were happy to sell those bonds because they sold them at 50 cents on the dollar, which is probably 25-35 cents more than they would otherwise ahve fetched in the market. The govt knew that they had to make it very incentful for the banks to sell. We (govt) overpaid but it was in an attempt to stem more losses at AIG at least on those positions.

    At that point the street thought that the governemtn would pay 50cents on the dollar for all the positions but at that point, in fact the same day, Paulson said that the Treasury would not purchase more toxic assets but would inject capital directly. The market traded down hard in certain sectors, primarily the comercial mortgaeg space, because the “inflated” bid never developed as hoped.

    Does this make sense??

    The Blackrock announcement was just made yesterday which indicates to me that th epersonnel at AIG have either lost the desire, appetite, or ability to manage the situation.

    In regard to Bernies wife. She filed for divorce last Thursday or Friday…(whatever happened to “stand by your man??”. It appears that she was the point person for a lot of the relationships that generated investors.

    I am not surprized that they took her passport. I would have doen the same with all family members.

    I am also surprized that they do not have Bernie under lock and key as I think he would and should be on suicide watch.

  • justsomeone

    I give lowering the cap gains tax 0%, that would be a total contradiction of the Buffett/Obama promise of “fairness”. Personally I don’t even know anyone that’s had a cap gain lately. Do you think Obama plans to raise tax on earned interest?

  • justsomeone

    Chris Cox is getting ready to hold a press conference on CNBC. I gotta go. Thanks.

  • LD

    The reason for lowering the capital gains rate is for the benefit of “new” capital to enter the market. If they are caught up on “fairness” with unemployment getting ready to move up dramatically then they just don’t get it.

    I do not think Obama will raise any taxes. He may not “get it” when it comes to the markets but he is also not so stupid as to raise any taxes at this juncture.

  • mountainaires
  • fiscalliberal

    LD – interesting detail in the following WAPO article

    HUD Chief Calls Aid on Mortgages A Failure

    Any thoughts on your part on Preston who is the head of HUD.

    From other articles, I understand they are getting a 40% recursion rate on modified loans in 6 Months.

  • LD

    Mountainaires,

    Thank you very much for sharing that sight? What do you think of Jurt’s thoughts? I think he is addressing some of what we have tried to broach here about the “embedded losses” in the system that nobody in the administration (Bernanke, Paulson et al) wants to openly estimate.

    I do think he is somewhat of a conspiracy theorist and an alarmist.

    A lot of what he is ptting forth is very insightful and accurate but it is a reflection of the market and what did occur but it was not a function of the few strictly trying to “take advantage” of the many. At least I do not believe that. That’s too simplistic for me.

    I do appreciate your sharing the sight.

    LD

  • LD

    Mountainaires,

    Thank you very much for sharing that sight? What do you think of Jurt’s thoughts? I think he is addressing some of what we have tried to broach here about the “embedded losses” in the system that nobody in the administration (Bernanke, Paulson et al) wants to openly estimate.

    I do think he is somewhat of a conspiracy theorist and an alarmist.

    A lot of what he is ptting forth is very insightful and accurate but it is a reflection of the market and what did occur but it was not a function of the few strictly trying to “take advantage” of the many. At least I do not believe that. That’s too simplistic for me.

    I do appreciate your sharing the site.

    LD

  • LD

    Fiscal…I really do not know or have opinion on the head of HUD. In regard to the default rate on those modified loans. No surprize because without a reduction in the principal and continued declines in the housing market, then those homeowners have little to no incentive to try to stay current on their mortgage.

    Provide some sort of tax incentives and credits for new buyers to enter the market and transfer the asset (that is the home) from weak hands to strong.

  • Linda C.

    From how I understand this, the banks are hoarding their cash to cover the bad loans they have already made. They do not want to lend to anyone including each other for fear they will be left short. Of course this will leave them short as it will accelerate the eventual default on loans…but I think the banks hope it will happen “to the other bank” and not their bank. The TARP money is really not going to buy the toxic securities out there and there is no market for them. They are left on the banks books. There is really no way to put a value on the toxic securities since no one knows what any of them might contain. I wonder if going back to the reverse auction is going to be what is needed. Knowing that financial institutions still have these toxic assets on their books is going to make me think twice about investing in them even if the capital gains taxes would be reduced to zero. People are still investing in treasuries even though the return is less than zero now.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZBA3Luek4AY&refer=home

    Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — For all their efforts to liquefy credit markets, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury show no signs of ending the 18-month freeze, as evidenced by the unprecedented gap between what banks and the U.S. government pay to borrow money.
    ….
    While the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is up 23 percent from last month’s low and the Fed promised to use all tools at its disposal to end the longest recession in a quarter century, investors remain wary of any securities except Treasuries. As banks hoard cash, businesses are struggling to refinance debt and consumers can’t get loans, restraining an economy forecast to shrink 4 percent this quarter, according to the median estimate of 79 strategists surveyed by Bloomberg.
    …..
    “There is no demand coming from the interbank market at all,” said Patrick Jacq, a senior fixed-income strategist for Paris-based BNP Paribas SA, France’s largest bank. “Banks are borrowing straight from the Fed and hoarding that cash till they need some and then returning to the Fed. We don’t expect a return to normal conditions in the coming six months.”

  • LD

    you GOT it!!

  • Linda C.

    LD
    I am not in favor of reducing the capital gains tax to zero since it really does nothing to fix the system.

    We need some regulations, but more importantly we need some regulators who beleive in regulation…We need to clean up the shadow banking system..get rid of these toxic assets. I don’t beleive in buying them from out of our own generosity either. Pennies on the dollar as far as I am concerned. I also beleive we need to strengthen the regional banking system. There are many banks and credit unions that did not participate in the ponzi scheme of derivatives and sub primes. We need to work with them to get things going again.Also we need to re-structure debt. Continuously raising interest rate on credit cards is going to backfire. People will simply stop paying leading to another collapse which isn’t too far off.

  • LD

    I agree with you that we need to have regulations that are effective and properly utilized by regulators.

    In regard to the bad positions at the banks, we need capital to replenish the system. How do we get that capital from the private market?

    In regard to credit, I think that as long as credit is properly priced through a disciplined credit underwriting process the market will work that out, although not instantaneously. All of this is a process.

    I do think that we run the risk of another leg down in this entire mess as unemployment is bound to move higher.

    I appreciate your thoughts!!

  • lark

    Dollar No Longer Haven After Fed Moves Rate Near Zero (Update2)

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a1MsoPDHjFS4

    Why something this obvious was ignored when deciding on a rate cut?

  • LD

    A weak dollar can actually benefit our exports but that is predicated on decent overseas demand. Aside from that there are no real benefits to a weak currency. It is inflationary, an indication of massive trade deficits and low interest rates, and a serious drag on future growth, as it detracts from foreign capital investing in our country.

    NOT GOOD!!

    Thanks for sharing that Bloomberg story. I really like that site. Nice find.

  • Snickers

    LD, I always look forward to your articles, and I’m getting a real understanding of what’s happening/happened in our economy thanks in large part to you.

  • LD

    Snickers,

    Thanks for the plug. Happy to provide some enlightenment to you and other loyal readers here at NQ.

    Do me a favor and spread the word to your family and friends!!

blog comments powered by Disqus