Zero changed his story by the hour. Some times by the minute. Some times in the same sentence.

But figure it out. Who has more money to “invest” in an Obama Presidency? Ranchers and miners or environmental groups?

Follow the money.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is the utility infielder of nanny groups. Because its name implies a wide-ranging universe of issues, the group can be counted on to inject itself into just about any debate where there’s an environmental argument to be made.
http://activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm

If that link doesn’t get you there, use the pull down menu or type their name into the search box.

Grijalva was all over O from the first, like Napolitano, our governor. Got a nice donation, I think. Too bad if he got left out.

The French have a saying that I think applies: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Obama’s “change” is just a redo of how Bush has operated and his ties of money….It’s more of money talks. It may be different sources of money, but in many cases, it is even the same sources of money, all of which just leads to corruption and less democracy for the rest.

In some cases, the enviro group then uses the ill gotten gains to set up a new “group” who in turn files a suit (this is especially lucrative if the terms of the settlement say that the first group can’t sue again within a certain time period.

The secondary “groups” are called “projects” – this makes them harder to track. The 990s are filed by the predatory litigious parent org.

HOWEVER — it would not surprise me at all of the guy Obama chooses had somehow bought the damned job — and the corporations will be happy — to hell with the well being of the land, humans or wild life.

Public lands, owned by all of us — are simply seen as property to be looted by many of the major corporations. Corporations only seem to care about their next quarter’s bottom line. Not all corporations are bad — but the ones that bought and paid for Obama are damned evil — and we probably won’t know for YEARS what percentage of Obama each corporation owns.

I’m from the west where the Fed Government owns a lot of the land. Problem is that the land hasn’t been managed wisely — roads are build and paid for by the tax payers and used by corporate interests — for logging etc.

The Secretary of the Interior is also in charge (control) of American Indian land — and talk about a mismanaged mess. The vast majority of Interior Sec. had no understanding nor comprehension of Indian culture etc. etc. The sad story of the mismanagement and looting of American Indian’s land and mineral rights can be found in several books.

This is a critical choice for the Native American/American Indians — and as a general rule the stupid ass Presidents rarely if ever consult with the tribes.

To be honest did any of us ever believe that Obama would make a wise choice when it comes to the continued looting of our resources — or a wise choice for American Indians???

Why the hell is he so damned predictable?????

Screech — slam door — *&*^&€$&* –

ARIZONA STAR – Rancher wins $600K in suit against enviros
By Mitch Tobin
ARIZONA DAILY STAR

Many of the center’s 21 photos depicted barren patches that captions described as “denuded” by cows. But Chilton’s lawyer showed jurors wide-angle photos taken at the same locations that revealed the surroundings as worthy of a postcard, with oaks and mesquites dotting lush, rolling hills.… tip of the iceberg.

They were against Congressman Mike Thompson (D) whose annual ratings on the “Humane Scorecard” have ranged from a very respectable 58 to 85 percent—but… BUT, and this is important, you are not allowed to vary from the program one iota in the world of progressive politics. BUT, Thompson HUNTS! in addiiton to his (up to) 85% approval rating.

In addition to having a respectable record on animal protection—with the hunting issues being the glaring exception—Thompson also has a solid record on protecting the environment. But he’s never been a leader, or a go-to person for the environmental community on the big fights of the day.

And that is how they bring someone down, damn them with faint praise, and then spread the talking points, the meme, the narrative “he’s never been a leader, or a go-to person”…

And they hype their guy Grijalva would bring much-needed hope for wildlife and the environment as Interior Secretary, and not just more of the same.

What it really means is Grijalva will give them what they want, and what they want is free rein. Most, if not all, of the enviro groups have become Predatory Litigants, staffing fleets of lawyers to use the law as a Panzer Unit to destroy their targets, to extort “go away” money by threatening lawsuits against the very deepest pockets they can find… it’s big business, it’s funded by huge Foundations. These are new age con men.

And they have done more to destroy the economy than you can imagine. And lest you think that because the “humane Scorecard” is a good thing because it is the Humane Society, think again… look ‘em up at http://activistcash.com/… just for starters… <i.Despite the words “humane society” on its letterhead, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is not affiliated with your local animal shelter. Despite the omnipresent dogs and cats in its fundraising materials, it’s not an organization that runs spay/neuter programs or takes in stray, neglected, and abused pets. And despite the common image of animal protection agencies as cash-strapped organizations dedicated to animal welfare, HSUS has become the wealthiest animal rights organization on earth.
HSUS is big, rich, and powerful, a “humane society” in name only. And while most local animal shelters are under-funded and unsung, HSUS has accumulated $113 million in assets and built a recognizable brand by capitalizing on the confusion its very name provokes. This misdirection results in an irony of which most animal lovers are unaware: HSUS raises enough money to finance animal shelters in every single state, with money to spare, yet it doesn’t operate a single one anywhere…. read the rest It’s an eye opener

I haven’t looked up this new choice who Obama is appointing, but I will. It will certainly be interesting IF he truly is more centrist.

We were promised that an Obama presidency would bring change.”

Remember when BOBO promised to stand with you in your fight to oppose telecom immunity?

LOL we tried to warn you. (LMAO) we truly did.