<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuke transportation story has explosive implications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charter Bus Trip</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-1557294</link>
		<dc:creator>Charter Bus Trip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-1557294</guid>
		<description>Great post.Thanks for sharing such a useful information with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.Thanks for sharing such a useful information with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charter Bus Trip</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-1557252</link>
		<dc:creator>Charter Bus Trip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-1557252</guid>
		<description>Great post. Thanks for sharing such a useful information with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Thanks for sharing such a useful information with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-35182</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-35182</guid>
		<description>Denny, 
-Finally someone said something.  Those people just happened to tragically die (most before this incident even happened).  I guess the next time I read the Air Force Times and see the pages of deaths for active duty airman I should just assume they were all stationed at Minot or Barksdale and that Chaney used his hidden missle to kill them all in traffic accidents.  Geeze people, listen to your selves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denny,<br />
-Finally someone said something.  Those people just happened to tragically die (most before this incident even happened).  I guess the next time I read the Air Force Times and see the pages of deaths for active duty airman I should just assume they were all stationed at Minot or Barksdale and that Chaney used his hidden missle to kill them all in traffic accidents.  Geeze people, listen to your selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32725</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32725</guid>
		<description>Given the nature of the clowns we now pay taxes to pull the levers of our government, and the fact that some extragovernmental players appear to have successfully employed techniques like non - judicial homicide (JFK and Wellstone come to mind) to advance their agendas without regard to the will of the people, be advised that the truth is always worse than we can imagine, in our wildest, most paranoid dreams.

That said, Occam&#039;s Razor applies, even as the data accumulate.

Thousands devote time and energy pointlessly speculating about what REALLY happened to the RMS TITANIC, the HINDENBURG, TWA Flight 800, Judge Crater, the Lindberg Baby, etc.

Almost no one expends any energy trying to find out what the LUSITANIA was really carrying, an issue which might be of some interest to hundreds of thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the nature of the clowns we now pay taxes to pull the levers of our government, and the fact that some extragovernmental players appear to have successfully employed techniques like non &#8211; judicial homicide (JFK and Wellstone come to mind) to advance their agendas without regard to the will of the people, be advised that the truth is always worse than we can imagine, in our wildest, most paranoid dreams.</p>
<p>That said, Occam&#8217;s Razor applies, even as the data accumulate.</p>
<p>Thousands devote time and energy pointlessly speculating about what REALLY happened to the RMS TITANIC, the HINDENBURG, TWA Flight 800, Judge Crater, the Lindberg Baby, etc.</p>
<p>Almost no one expends any energy trying to find out what the LUSITANIA was really carrying, an issue which might be of some interest to hundreds of thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Competing against our own? : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32696</link>
		<dc:creator>Competing against our own? : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 05:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32696</guid>
		<description>[...] Read Rob&#8217;s October 8 op-ed, re-posted here: &#8220;Nuke transportation story has explosive implications.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read Rob&#8217;s October 8 op-ed, re-posted here: &#8220;Nuke transportation story has explosive implications.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FightTheFuture</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32103</link>
		<dc:creator>FightTheFuture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32103</guid>
		<description>So when the bright flash blisters your face to the bone and blows your ass away, how will that double-wide look to you then?  Will you build it up, or just swallow the dreamy delusions for sanity and roll it into reality world?

Some things are better off assuming the worst.  Given Bu$hitCo + Nuclear Warheads and very disturbing stories from whistleblowers about them, I will assume the worse!!  I can always say sorry later, but to call it tinfoil is the real disservice here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when the bright flash blisters your face to the bone and blows your ass away, how will that double-wide look to you then?  Will you build it up, or just swallow the dreamy delusions for sanity and roll it into reality world?</p>
<p>Some things are better off assuming the worst.  Given Bu$hitCo + Nuclear Warheads and very disturbing stories from whistleblowers about them, I will assume the worse!!  I can always say sorry later, but to call it tinfoil is the real disservice here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FightTheFuture</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32102</link>
		<dc:creator>FightTheFuture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32102</guid>
		<description>Oh wow!!!   Well, that makes it &lt;em&gt;all &lt;/em&gt;better!  &lt;strong&gt;NOT!!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow!!!   Well, that makes it <em>all </em>better!  <strong>NOT!!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serena1313</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32009</link>
		<dc:creator>serena1313</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-32009</guid>
		<description>Fred Thanks. 

I&#039;ve read WMR at times, but I cannot verify the veracity of his reports either. However a lot of the same information has been published elsewhere in various media sources. 

WMR seems to be pretty much on the up-and-up. I do not recall reading any news sources that refuted the information in his stories. On the otherhand, if I remember correctly, not all of the information he supplies can be readily verified either. 

Insofar as the Minot A/F Base deaths: only 2 of the six died prior to 30 August 2007, both on the 20 July 2007. And Barksdale A/F Base, I believe Larry mentioned, is the jumping off base for planes headed for the Middle-East. 

Announcenments of their deaths:
http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012
http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp
http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988
http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt
http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think Bush&#039;s father has more common sense in his little finger than his son:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

&quot;By Michael E. Salla, M.A., Ph.D.

&quot;The discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 was, according to Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, the first time in 40 years that a nuclear armed plane had been allowed to fly in the U.S. LINK. Since 1968, after a SAC bomber crashed in Greenland, all nuclear armed aircraft have been grounded but were kept on a constant state of alert. After the end of the Cold War, President &lt;strong&gt;George H.W. Bush&lt;/strong&gt; ordered in &lt;strong&gt;1991&lt;/strong&gt; that nuclear weapons were to be removed from all aircraft and stored in nearby facilities. ...&quot;
 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18374.htm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

&quot;09/13/07 &quot;The Canadian&quot; --- - Critically exploring whether or not there was a covert attempt to instigate a catastrophic nuclear war against Iran is illuminated through an introduction using the recent B-52 Incident. On August 30, a B-52 bomber armed with five nuclear-tipped Advanced Cruise missiles travelled from Minot Air Force base, North Dakota, to Barksdale Air Force base, Louisiana, in the United States. Each missile had an adjustable yield between five and 150 kilotons of TNT which is at the lower end of the destructive capacities of U.S. nuclear weapons. For example, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had a yield of 13 kilotons, while the Bravo Hydrogen bomb test of 1954 had a yield of 15,000 kilotons. The B-52 story was first covered in the Army Times on 5 September after the nuclear armed aircraft was discovered by Airmen.&quot;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
YOU TUBE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i06cWfmnrw
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anyhow this story has gotten, at best, little attention in the US press. 

I find it alarming Bush was that close to dropping &lt;strong&gt;nuclear&lt;/strong&gt; weapons on Iran. Did anyone in Congress know? 

I wonder ... had Bush &amp; Cheney not been stopped if Congress would have started impeachment hearings? What is it going to take!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Thanks. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read WMR at times, but I cannot verify the veracity of his reports either. However a lot of the same information has been published elsewhere in various media sources. </p>
<p>WMR seems to be pretty much on the up-and-up. I do not recall reading any news sources that refuted the information in his stories. On the otherhand, if I remember correctly, not all of the information he supplies can be readily verified either. </p>
<p>Insofar as the Minot A/F Base deaths: only 2 of the six died prior to 30 August 2007, both on the 20 July 2007. And Barksdale A/F Base, I believe Larry mentioned, is the jumping off base for planes headed for the Middle-East. </p>
<p>Announcenments of their deaths:<br />
<a href="http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465" rel="nofollow">http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465</a><br />
<a href="http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012" rel="nofollow">http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988" rel="nofollow">http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt</a><br />
<a href="http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html</a><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
I think Bush&#8217;s father has more common sense in his little finger than his son:<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>&#8220;By Michael E. Salla, M.A., Ph.D.</p>
<p>&#8220;The discovery of the nuclear armed B-52 was, according to Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of American Scientists, the first time in 40 years that a nuclear armed plane had been allowed to fly in the U.S. LINK. Since 1968, after a SAC bomber crashed in Greenland, all nuclear armed aircraft have been grounded but were kept on a constant state of alert. After the end of the Cold War, President <strong>George H.W. Bush</strong> ordered in <strong>1991</strong> that nuclear weapons were to be removed from all aircraft and stored in nearby facilities. &#8230;&#8221;<br />
 <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18374.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18374.htm</a><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>&#8220;09/13/07 &#8220;The Canadian&#8221; &#8212; &#8211; Critically exploring whether or not there was a covert attempt to instigate a catastrophic nuclear war against Iran is illuminated through an introduction using the recent B-52 Incident. On August 30, a B-52 bomber armed with five nuclear-tipped Advanced Cruise missiles travelled from Minot Air Force base, North Dakota, to Barksdale Air Force base, Louisiana, in the United States. Each missile had an adjustable yield between five and 150 kilotons of TNT which is at the lower end of the destructive capacities of U.S. nuclear weapons. For example, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima had a yield of 13 kilotons, while the Bravo Hydrogen bomb test of 1954 had a yield of 15,000 kilotons. The B-52 story was first covered in the Army Times on 5 September after the nuclear armed aircraft was discovered by Airmen.&#8221;<br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
YOU TUBE:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i06cWfmnrw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i06cWfmnrw</a><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>Anyhow this story has gotten, at best, little attention in the US press. </p>
<p>I find it alarming Bush was that close to dropping <strong>nuclear</strong> weapons on Iran. Did anyone in Congress know? </p>
<p>I wonder &#8230; had Bush &amp; Cheney not been stopped if Congress would have started impeachment hearings? What is it going to take!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31872</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31872</guid>
		<description>&quot;The B-52H bomber can carry up to six AGM-129A missiles on each of two external pylons for a total of 12 per aircraft. The AGM-129A provides the bomber the ability to attack multiple targets without penetrating an air defense system.&quot;

See the pic of just exactly this at: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM

also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2006_0306_b52_2lg.jpg

From Wikipedia: &quot;AGM-86B missiles can be air-launched in large numbers by the bomber force. B-52H bombers carry six AGM-86B or AGM-86C missiles on each of two externally mounted pylons &lt;strong&gt;and eight internally on a rotary launcher,&lt;/strong&gt; giving the B-52H a maximum capacity of 20 missiles per aircraft.&quot;

The missiles in question Minot-Barksdale were ACM-129A&#039;s, per numerous reports.

Not the same missile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The B-52H bomber can carry up to six AGM-129A missiles on each of two external pylons for a total of 12 per aircraft. The AGM-129A provides the bomber the ability to attack multiple targets without penetrating an air defense system.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the pic of just exactly this at: </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM</a></p>
<p>also:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2006_0306_b52_2lg.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2006_0306_b52_2lg.jpg</a></p>
<p>From Wikipedia: &#8220;AGM-86B missiles can be air-launched in large numbers by the bomber force. B-52H bombers carry six AGM-86B or AGM-86C missiles on each of two externally mounted pylons <strong>and eight internally on a rotary launcher,</strong> giving the B-52H a maximum capacity of 20 missiles per aircraft.&#8221;</p>
<p>The missiles in question Minot-Barksdale were ACM-129A&#8217;s, per numerous reports.</p>
<p>Not the same missile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31860</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31860</guid>
		<description>&quot;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.&quot; - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Carl Sagan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.&#8221; &#8211; <strong><em>Carl Sagan</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31857</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31857</guid>
		<description>Here is Rob&#039;s blog URL: 

http://robinstorm.blogspot.com/

Pretty informative for those of us who have labored on salt water. If I was still doing that work, AND had a fast connection via INMARSAT, I&#039;d have his stuff on the Master&#039;s screen before breakfast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Rob&#8217;s blog URL: </p>
<p><a href="http://robinstorm.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://robinstorm.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Pretty informative for those of us who have labored on salt water. If I was still doing that work, AND had a fast connection via INMARSAT, I&#8217;d have his stuff on the Master&#8217;s screen before breakfast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31853</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31853</guid>
		<description>I am sorry folks but CyberCOM went active about the time of this story.  All of the stories on this subject have false statements - The Advanced Missiles can not be flown on wing mounts they use a rotary internal system.  So the story is a fictional Psyops test.
For Cyber Command.

Totally reminds me of a false flag operational test - Able Danger...

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry folks but CyberCOM went active about the time of this story.  All of the stories on this subject have false statements &#8211; The Advanced Missiles can not be flown on wing mounts they use a rotary internal system.  So the story is a fictional Psyops test.<br />
For Cyber Command.</p>
<p>Totally reminds me of a false flag operational test &#8211; Able Danger&#8230;</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31845</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31845</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Mr. Dobbs.   I, for one, appreciate these references and your research.

And, I should also have said thank you to Rob.  I&#039;m glad you are keeping this issue out before the public.  We need more people getting interested enough to start asking some questions about this.  Something&#039;s amiss, and it&#039;s too important to just let it disappear under the radar.  Thank you, Rob!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Mr. Dobbs.   I, for one, appreciate these references and your research.</p>
<p>And, I should also have said thank you to Rob.  I&#8217;m glad you are keeping this issue out before the public.  We need more people getting interested enough to start asking some questions about this.  Something&#8217;s amiss, and it&#8217;s too important to just let it disappear under the radar.  Thank you, Rob!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31828</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31828</guid>
		<description>URL&#039;s for &lt;strong&gt;PROJECT CHECKMATE&lt;/strong&gt; stories (largely duplicating each other):

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article2512097.ece

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_CHECKMATE

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22467862-15084,00.html

Work Break time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URL&#8217;s for <strong>PROJECT CHECKMATE</strong> stories (largely duplicating each other):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article2512097.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article2512097.ece</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_CHECKMATE" rel="nofollow">http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_CHECKMATE</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22467862-15084,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22467862-15084,00.html</a></p>
<p>Work Break time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred C. Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/936/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31827</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred C. Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/10/08/nuke-transportation-story-has-explosive-implications/#comment-31827</guid>
		<description>This from Comments on THE RAW STORY, citing Wayne Madsen. My apologies in advance for the length of this citation. Additionally, I have no information, data or opinion regarding Madsen&#039;s methods, veracity, sources or intent.

I have eliminated some of the original article because of space considerations.

Masden Reports:

&quot;B-52 Nukes Headed for Iran, Not For Decommissioning: Airforce Refused

-- SPECIAL REPORT --
Air Force refused to fly weapons to Middle East theater
By Wayne Madsen
Sept. 24, 2007
Author&#039;s website: 
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com

WMR has learned from U.S. and foreign intelligence sources that the B-52 transporting six stealth AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missiles, each armed with a W-80-1 nuclear warhead, on August 30, were destined for the Middle East via Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.

However, elements of the Air Force, supported by U.S. intelligence agency personnel, successfully revealed the ultimate destination of the nuclear weapons and the mission was aborted due to internal opposition within the Air Force and U.S. Intelligence Community.

Yesterday, the Washington Post attempted to explain away the fact that America&#039;s nuclear command and control system broke down in an unprecedented manner by reporting that it was the result of &quot;security failures at multiple levels.&quot; It is now apparent that the command and control breakdown, reported as a BENT SPEAR incident to the Secretary of Defense and White House, was not the result of a command and control chain-of-command &quot;failures&quot; but the result of a revolt and push back by various echelons within the Air Force and intelligence agencies against a planned U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional
weapons.

The Washington Post story on BENT SPEAR may have actually been an effort in damage control by the Bush administration. WMR has been informed by a knowledgeable source that one of the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles was, and may still be, unaccounted for. In that case, the nuclear reporting incident would have gone far beyond BENT SPEAR to a National Command Authority alert known as EMPTY QUIVER, with the special classification of PINNACLE.

Just as this report was being prepared, Newsweek reported that Vice President Dick Cheney&#039;s recently-departed Middle East adviser, David Wurmser, told a small group of advisers some months ago that Cheney had considered asking Israel to launch a missile attack on the Iranian nuclear site at Natanz. Cheney reasoned that after an Iranian retaliatory strike, the United States would have ample reasons to launch its own massive attack on Iran. However, plans for Israel to attack Iran directly were altered to an Israeli attack on a supposed Syrian-Iranian-North Korean nuclear installation in northern Syria.

WMR has learned that a U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional weapons was scheduled to coincide with Israel&#039;s September 6 air attack on a reputed Syrian nuclear facility in Dayr az-Zwar, near the village of Tal Abyad, in northern Syria, near the Turkish border. Israel&#039;s attack, code named OPERATION ORCHARD, was to provide a reason for the U.S. to strike Iran. The neo-conservative propaganda onslaught was to cite the cooperation of the George Bush&#039;s three remaining &quot;Axis of Evil&quot; states -- Syria, Iran, and North Korea -- to justify a sustained Israeli attack on Syria and a massive U.S. military attack on Iran.

WMR has learned from military sources on both sides of the Atlantic that there was a definite connection between Israel&#039;s OPERATION ORCHARD and BENT SPEAR involving the B-52 that flew the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale. There is also a connection between these two events as the Pentagon&#039;s highly-classified PROJECT CHECKMATE, a compartmented U.S. Air Force program that has been working on an attack plan for Iran since June 2007, around the same time that Cheney was working on the joint Israeli-U.S. attack scenario on Iran.

PROJECT CHECKMATE was leaked in an article by military analyst Eric Margolis in the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper, the /Times of London/, is a program that involves over two dozen Air Force officers and is headed by Brig. Gen. Lawrence Stutzriem and his chief civilian adviser, Dr. Lani Kass, a former Israeli military intelligence officer who, astoundingly, is now involved in planning a joint U.S.-Israeli massive military attack on Iran that involves a &quot;decapitating&quot; blow on Iran by hitting between three to four thousand targets in the country. Stutzriem and Kass report directly to the Air Force Chief of Staff, General Michael Moseley, who has also been charged with preparing a report on the B-52/nuclear weapons incident.

Kass&#039; area of speciality is cyber-warfare, which includes ensuring &quot;information blockades,&quot; such as that imposed by the Israeli government on the Israeli media regarding the Syrian air attack on the alleged Syrian &quot;nuclear installation.&quot; British intelligence sources have reported that the Israeli attack on Syria was a &quot;true flag&quot; attack originally designed to foreshadow a U.S. attack on Iran. After the U.S. Air Force push back against transporting the six cruise nuclear-armed AGM-129s to the Middle East, Israel went ahead with its attack on Syria in order to help ratchet up tensions between Washington on one side and Damascus, Tehran, and Pyongyang on the other.

The other part of CHECKMATE&#039;s brief is to ensure that a media &quot;perception management&quot; is waged against Syria, Iran, and North Korea. This involves articles such as that which appeared with Joby Warrick&#039;s and Walter Pincus&#039; bylines in yesterdays /Washington Post/. The article, titled &quot;The Saga of a Bent Spear,&quot; quotes a number of seasoned Air Force nuclear weapons experts as saying that such an incident is unprecedented in the history of the Air Force. For example, Retired Air Force General Eugene Habiger, the former chief of the U.S. Strategic Command, said he has been in the &quot;nuclear business&quot; since 1966 and has never been aware of an incident &quot;more disturbing.&quot;

Command and control breakdowns involving U.S. nuclear weapons are unprecedented, except for that fact that the U.S. military is now waging an internal war against neo-cons who are embedded in the U.S. government and military chain of command who are intent on using nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive war with Iran.

CHECKMATE and OPERATION ORCHARD would have provided the cover for a pre-emptive U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran had it not been for BENT SPEAR involving the B-52. In on the plan to launch a pre-emptive attack on Iran involving nuclear weapons were, according to our sources, Cheney, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley; members of the CHECKMATE team at the Pentagon, who have close connections to Israeli intelligence and pro-Israeli think tanks in Washington, including the Hudson Institute; British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, a political adviser to Tony Blair prior to becoming a Member of Parliament; Israeli political leaders like Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu; and French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who did his part last week to ratchet up tensions with Iran by suggesting that war with Iran was a probability. Kouchner retracted his statement after the U.S. plans for Iran were delayed.

Although the Air Force tried to keep the B-52 nuclear incident from the media, anonymous Air Force personnel leaked the story to /Military Times/ on September 5, the day before the Israelis attacked the alleged nuclear installation in Syria and the day planned for the simultaneous U.S. attack on Iran. The leaking of classified information on U.S. nuclear weapons disposition or movement to the media, is, itself, unprecedented. Air Force regulations require the sending of classified BEELINE reports to higher Air Force authorities on the disclosure of classified Air Force information to the media.

In another highly unusual move, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked an outside inquiry board to look into BENT SPEAR, even before the Air Force has completed its own investigation, a virtual vote of no confidence in the official investigation being conducted by Major General Douglas Raaberg, chief of air and space operations at the Air Combat Command.

Gates asked former Air Force Chief of Staff, retired General Larry Welch, to lead a Defense Science Board task force that will also look into the BENT SPEAR incident. The official Air Force investigation has reportedly been delayed for unknown reasons. Welch is President and CEO of the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), a federally-funded research contractor that operates three research centers, including one for Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President and another for the National Security Agency. One of the board members of IDA is Dr. Suzanne H. Woolsey of the Paladin Capital Group and wife of former CIA director and arch-neocon James Woolsey.

WMR has learned that neither the upper echelons of the State Department nor the British Foreign Office were privy to OPERATION ORCHARD, although Hadley briefed President Bush on Israeli spy satellite intelligence that showed the Syrian installation was a joint nuclear facility built with North Korean and Iranian assistance. However, it is puzzling why Hadley would rely on Israeli imagery intelligence (IMINT) from its OFEK (Horizon) 7 satellite when considering that U.S. IMINT satellites have greater capabilities.

The Air Force&#039;s &quot;information warfare&quot; campaign against media reports on CHECKMATE and OPERATION ORCHARD also affected international reporting of the recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolution asking Israel to place its nuclear weapons program under IAEA controls, similar to those that the United States wants imposed on Iran and North Korea. The resolution also called for a nuclear-free zone throughout the Middle East. The IAEA&#039;s resolution, titled &quot;Application of IAEA Safeguards in the Middle East,&quot; was passed by the 144-member IAEA General Meeting on September 20 by a vote of 53 to 2, with 47 abstentions. The only two countries to vote against were Israel and the United States.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from Comments on THE RAW STORY, citing Wayne Madsen. My apologies in advance for the length of this citation. Additionally, I have no information, data or opinion regarding Madsen&#8217;s methods, veracity, sources or intent.</p>
<p>I have eliminated some of the original article because of space considerations.</p>
<p>Masden Reports:</p>
<p>&#8220;B-52 Nukes Headed for Iran, Not For Decommissioning: Airforce Refused</p>
<p>&#8211; SPECIAL REPORT &#8211;<br />
Air Force refused to fly weapons to Middle East theater<br />
By Wayne Madsen<br />
Sept. 24, 2007<br />
Author&#8217;s website:<br />
<a href="http://www.waynemadsenreport.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.waynemadsenreport.com</a></p>
<p>WMR has learned from U.S. and foreign intelligence sources that the B-52 transporting six stealth AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missiles, each armed with a W-80-1 nuclear warhead, on August 30, were destined for the Middle East via Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.</p>
<p>However, elements of the Air Force, supported by U.S. intelligence agency personnel, successfully revealed the ultimate destination of the nuclear weapons and the mission was aborted due to internal opposition within the Air Force and U.S. Intelligence Community.</p>
<p>Yesterday, the Washington Post attempted to explain away the fact that America&#8217;s nuclear command and control system broke down in an unprecedented manner by reporting that it was the result of &#8220;security failures at multiple levels.&#8221; It is now apparent that the command and control breakdown, reported as a BENT SPEAR incident to the Secretary of Defense and White House, was not the result of a command and control chain-of-command &#8220;failures&#8221; but the result of a revolt and push back by various echelons within the Air Force and intelligence agencies against a planned U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional<br />
weapons.</p>
<p>The Washington Post story on BENT SPEAR may have actually been an effort in damage control by the Bush administration. WMR has been informed by a knowledgeable source that one of the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles was, and may still be, unaccounted for. In that case, the nuclear reporting incident would have gone far beyond BENT SPEAR to a National Command Authority alert known as EMPTY QUIVER, with the special classification of PINNACLE.</p>
<p>Just as this report was being prepared, Newsweek reported that Vice President Dick Cheney&#8217;s recently-departed Middle East adviser, David Wurmser, told a small group of advisers some months ago that Cheney had considered asking Israel to launch a missile attack on the Iranian nuclear site at Natanz. Cheney reasoned that after an Iranian retaliatory strike, the United States would have ample reasons to launch its own massive attack on Iran. However, plans for Israel to attack Iran directly were altered to an Israeli attack on a supposed Syrian-Iranian-North Korean nuclear installation in northern Syria.</p>
<p>WMR has learned that a U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear and conventional weapons was scheduled to coincide with Israel&#8217;s September 6 air attack on a reputed Syrian nuclear facility in Dayr az-Zwar, near the village of Tal Abyad, in northern Syria, near the Turkish border. Israel&#8217;s attack, code named OPERATION ORCHARD, was to provide a reason for the U.S. to strike Iran. The neo-conservative propaganda onslaught was to cite the cooperation of the George Bush&#8217;s three remaining &#8220;Axis of Evil&#8221; states &#8212; Syria, Iran, and North Korea &#8212; to justify a sustained Israeli attack on Syria and a massive U.S. military attack on Iran.</p>
<p>WMR has learned from military sources on both sides of the Atlantic that there was a definite connection between Israel&#8217;s OPERATION ORCHARD and BENT SPEAR involving the B-52 that flew the six nuclear-armed cruise missiles from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale. There is also a connection between these two events as the Pentagon&#8217;s highly-classified PROJECT CHECKMATE, a compartmented U.S. Air Force program that has been working on an attack plan for Iran since June 2007, around the same time that Cheney was working on the joint Israeli-U.S. attack scenario on Iran.</p>
<p>PROJECT CHECKMATE was leaked in an article by military analyst Eric Margolis in the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper, the /Times of London/, is a program that involves over two dozen Air Force officers and is headed by Brig. Gen. Lawrence Stutzriem and his chief civilian adviser, Dr. Lani Kass, a former Israeli military intelligence officer who, astoundingly, is now involved in planning a joint U.S.-Israeli massive military attack on Iran that involves a &#8220;decapitating&#8221; blow on Iran by hitting between three to four thousand targets in the country. Stutzriem and Kass report directly to the Air Force Chief of Staff, General Michael Moseley, who has also been charged with preparing a report on the B-52/nuclear weapons incident.</p>
<p>Kass&#8217; area of speciality is cyber-warfare, which includes ensuring &#8220;information blockades,&#8221; such as that imposed by the Israeli government on the Israeli media regarding the Syrian air attack on the alleged Syrian &#8220;nuclear installation.&#8221; British intelligence sources have reported that the Israeli attack on Syria was a &#8220;true flag&#8221; attack originally designed to foreshadow a U.S. attack on Iran. After the U.S. Air Force push back against transporting the six cruise nuclear-armed AGM-129s to the Middle East, Israel went ahead with its attack on Syria in order to help ratchet up tensions between Washington on one side and Damascus, Tehran, and Pyongyang on the other.</p>
<p>The other part of CHECKMATE&#8217;s brief is to ensure that a media &#8220;perception management&#8221; is waged against Syria, Iran, and North Korea. This involves articles such as that which appeared with Joby Warrick&#8217;s and Walter Pincus&#8217; bylines in yesterdays /Washington Post/. The article, titled &#8220;The Saga of a Bent Spear,&#8221; quotes a number of seasoned Air Force nuclear weapons experts as saying that such an incident is unprecedented in the history of the Air Force. For example, Retired Air Force General Eugene Habiger, the former chief of the U.S. Strategic Command, said he has been in the &#8220;nuclear business&#8221; since 1966 and has never been aware of an incident &#8220;more disturbing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Command and control breakdowns involving U.S. nuclear weapons are unprecedented, except for that fact that the U.S. military is now waging an internal war against neo-cons who are embedded in the U.S. government and military chain of command who are intent on using nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive war with Iran.</p>
<p>CHECKMATE and OPERATION ORCHARD would have provided the cover for a pre-emptive U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran had it not been for BENT SPEAR involving the B-52. In on the plan to launch a pre-emptive attack on Iran involving nuclear weapons were, according to our sources, Cheney, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley; members of the CHECKMATE team at the Pentagon, who have close connections to Israeli intelligence and pro-Israeli think tanks in Washington, including the Hudson Institute; British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, a political adviser to Tony Blair prior to becoming a Member of Parliament; Israeli political leaders like Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu; and French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who did his part last week to ratchet up tensions with Iran by suggesting that war with Iran was a probability. Kouchner retracted his statement after the U.S. plans for Iran were delayed.</p>
<p>Although the Air Force tried to keep the B-52 nuclear incident from the media, anonymous Air Force personnel leaked the story to /Military Times/ on September 5, the day before the Israelis attacked the alleged nuclear installation in Syria and the day planned for the simultaneous U.S. attack on Iran. The leaking of classified information on U.S. nuclear weapons disposition or movement to the media, is, itself, unprecedented. Air Force regulations require the sending of classified BEELINE reports to higher Air Force authorities on the disclosure of classified Air Force information to the media.</p>
<p>In another highly unusual move, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has asked an outside inquiry board to look into BENT SPEAR, even before the Air Force has completed its own investigation, a virtual vote of no confidence in the official investigation being conducted by Major General Douglas Raaberg, chief of air and space operations at the Air Combat Command.</p>
<p>Gates asked former Air Force Chief of Staff, retired General Larry Welch, to lead a Defense Science Board task force that will also look into the BENT SPEAR incident. The official Air Force investigation has reportedly been delayed for unknown reasons. Welch is President and CEO of the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), a federally-funded research contractor that operates three research centers, including one for Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President and another for the National Security Agency. One of the board members of IDA is Dr. Suzanne H. Woolsey of the Paladin Capital Group and wife of former CIA director and arch-neocon James Woolsey.</p>
<p>WMR has learned that neither the upper echelons of the State Department nor the British Foreign Office were privy to OPERATION ORCHARD, although Hadley briefed President Bush on Israeli spy satellite intelligence that showed the Syrian installation was a joint nuclear facility built with North Korean and Iranian assistance. However, it is puzzling why Hadley would rely on Israeli imagery intelligence (IMINT) from its OFEK (Horizon) 7 satellite when considering that U.S. IMINT satellites have greater capabilities.</p>
<p>The Air Force&#8217;s &#8220;information warfare&#8221; campaign against media reports on CHECKMATE and OPERATION ORCHARD also affected international reporting of the recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolution asking Israel to place its nuclear weapons program under IAEA controls, similar to those that the United States wants imposed on Iran and North Korea. The resolution also called for a nuclear-free zone throughout the Middle East. The IAEA&#8217;s resolution, titled &#8220;Application of IAEA Safeguards in the Middle East,&#8221; was passed by the 144-member IAEA General Meeting on September 20 by a vote of 53 to 2, with 47 abstentions. The only two countries to vote against were Israel and the United States.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

