I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you…

To ask one agent, Larry Johnson, in this case, “to justify what the CIA did and admit to the crims you probably either committed or hid from the citizens of this country” is idiot talk.

If Larry Johnson never killed anyone, or was in a position of unethical behavior, and you assault him with this crap, why should he answer you?

Here try it on for size.

Robert, since you are a man, and most child molestors are men, will you please justify what men did and admit to the molestations you probably committed or hid from the citizens in this community?

You don’t get it. I’ve met your type before many times and you make me puke. You are a prejudiced idiot. You don’t have to be that, but you play it well. You decide the whole based on the parts. And then describe the parts as if they are the whole. This is stupid thinking.

My toes are not my eyes, but yet they are connected, how strange. But should my toe suffer when I poke my eye?

One such evidence is that you portray those of us who agree, mostly, with Larry as “kissasses” and “sycophants”. I’ve played this stupid game around Progressive action groups for the last several years and I’m immune to its consequences, but you are not. Each time you do it, you show me you cannot make distinctions, you don’t ask questions to get real answers, and you are so caught up in your own view of the world that no other view matters. You’ve got all the answers before you ask a question.

If you have a convoluted notion that the CIA is all one thing, then enjoy that ignorance. If you think the cops are all bad, and all government officals are corrupt, and all politicans are corrupt, then enjoy that ignorance, and the size of the army against you will grow and grow.

Personally I prefer to see things as they are, regardless of my biases, wants, denials, and petty categories. A man who sees 5 colors is blind and man who hears 5 tones is deaf.

Or in other words, as one gang banger policeman friend o’ mine once said, “without criminals I’d be finished”. We already know from successive leaks around the World that policing is rigged to ensure that criminals are plentiful. Therefore, for me, living in an age that actively promotes a terrorist threat why wouldn’t I assume the same rigging methods be applied?

This not to say that some incarcerated criminals are not very nasty people, or that there are not fanatical [for lack of terminology] groups scheming acts of chaos. If we look at the last 100 years history, why have the prisons always been albeit full to the brim, with far more on the streets than could possibly be housed. Clearly, the incasteration process does not work. The very creation of prisions have defined an under class who were to be perpetually ostracised by good society. Would you hire a crim? Those who aren’t ostracised feel that way.

Humanity has shown itself excellent at attacking manifestations [phoney or real], but piss poor at determining the root cause and implementing a strategy of improvement.

Until law enforcement learns to get of its high horse, it will be the same old shit…..forever, no matter how you describe it. Terrorists terrorise for reasons. First determine the reasons and then design a World that ensures no reason. At present the reason for counter terrorism is terrorism. If the World was tolerant of terrorism, it just let it happen, would anyone bother to terrorise again?

I motoin terrorism exists only because of it’s reaction. Take away the reaction, it serves no purpose.

His email is: hirsute_123@yahoo.com

Feel free to drop him a line. However, no threats of physical or mental harm should be issued. Play nice. But I despise chickenshits like this guy who try to hide behind anonymous posts.

You make wild assertions and employ guilt by association. If you are not taking your meds then there is a medical reason for your stupidity. Otherwise, you’re a flaming asshole and I will ban your ass in heartbeat. I’m not going to subject this community to a certifiable idiot like you.

That’s not a threat, that’s a promise.

Why can’t you answer some simple questions? Maybe you’ll feel better after some of the losers here post some more garbage threats. Let me know next time you’re around Berkeley and I’ll come out and listen to and see if you’re up to an adult dialogue.

As to his loyalty in service to his country as a CIA employee, there is no question.

Has everything the CIA has done over the years in the interest of “national security” been completely right, correct, or what ever words you want to use?

Probably not.

Is Larry Johnson responsible for everything the CIA has done good or bad?

Of course not.

So what is the problem here?

I don’t understand why certain people here are blaming Larry for creditability problems the CIA may be experiencing today or even in the past.

I don’t believe Larry’s resume said anything about him being the head of the CIA for the his entire career unless that info has been redacted (only kidding larry) so how could he know everything that that has gone on?

Is Larry risking his reputation by all the remarks he said about Valerie Plame’s Career between 1985 and 2002?

I don’t know and I doubt if any of you know.

Did he have to sign any lifetime non disclosure documents when he retired? (You did retire right?)

Same answer.

So lighten up on Larry, we are lucky to have someone who is willing to share what he can with us.

So if some of you people are interested in ripping a former CIA employee a new one over all your perceived wrongs the CIA has done over the years go somewhere else to do your ripping, but you might have a problem as I am not sure if you ran an ad for “CIA agents wanted to blame for all the CIA problems over the years” you would get a lot of takers.