Harry Reid: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
By Pat Racimora on January 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM in Barack Obama, Current Affairs, Harry Reid, Racism, Rod Blagojevich
(Susan’s Note: Stay tuned tonight! Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy is taking a weed-whacker to the undergrowth of the tangled Caroline Kennedy/Gov. David Paterson/New York State mess. Then you’re in for an earful of Uppity Woman’s antipathy towards the Illinois State mess that the Democrats have gotten themselves into. )
Rod Blagojevich may be a little crazy alright—crazy as a pissed-off fox. The still-legally-sitting Governor’s appointment of Roland W. Burris to take over Barack Obama’s vacated senate seat has set off a firestorm among African American lawmakers and legal scholars, and should be of great concern to all of us for reasons noted below.
No matter what we think of the guy, Blagojevich is legally permitted to make such an appointment, despite being charged (but not yet indicted) for conspiring to commit fraud and soliciting bribery. No constitutional provision exists to defy his action.
But Senate Democrats have vowed to refuse to seat anyone appointed by the besieged Governor of Illinois. Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid has stated in no uncertain terms that Burris, specifically, will never be seated.
Here’s the looming problem for Senate Democrats. Burris is an African American. He wants the job. His credentials and other requirements (i.e., age, residency, citizenship) to be a U. S. Senator are satisfactory, which is all the Constitution demands. And, with Obama gone, there would be no other AA senators.
Burris is standing strong against Reid’s threat. He has already taken Illinois’ Secretary of State Jessie White to court to force him to certify the appointment. Burris may well prevail because the SoS, it turns out, has no real veto power. And if Burris prevails there, what will Harry Reid do if he shows up on the Senate stairs later this month? Ask Capitol Police to whisk him away? How is that going to play out on the 6 o’clock news?
Black members in the House have given fair warning. As stated in the New York Times, “Several black lawmakers said the Senate’s efforts to block the appointment of Mr. Burris by Mr. Blagojevich would be viewed by many black voters as a signal that systemic roadblocks continue to prevent qualified, respected African-Americans from climbing the political ladder. They said Mr. Obama’s opposition to the appointment would do little to ease such concerns among their black constituents, who remain concerned that the Senate has no black members.”
Rejecting an African American who was legally appointed and qualified for the job adds up to a PR nightmare and puts our new President in an even more precarious position. President-elect Obama’s response is,
Roland Burris is a good man and a fine public servant, but the Senate Democrats made it clear weeks ago that they cannot accept an appointment made by a governor who is accused of selling this very Senate seat. I agree with their decision, and it is extremely disappointing that Governor Blagojevich has chosen to ignore it. I believe the best resolution would be for the Governor to resign his office and allow a lawful and appropriate process of succession to take place. While Governor Blagojevich is entitled to his day in court, the people of Illinois are entitled to a functioning government and major decisions free of taint and controversy.
So now the Senate, with the concurrence of the newly elected President, wants to expand its powers. Legal analyst Peter Johnson points out, as have many other legal scholars, that the law favors Blagojevich and Burris. He notes that the Consitution allows Congress to make a decision based only on constitutional parameters, not, whether they like who appointed him.
So, this is the change we’ve been waiting for? Increased Washington powers in state affairs?
As for Harry, he should have kept his mouth shut. Chicago plays much rougher, tougher and smarter than he can.


















