<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NO QUARTER &#187; Veterans Administration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/category/obama-barack-president-barack/obamas-cabinet/veterans-administration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>News I Rarely Hear on TV * Open Thread</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/02/05/news-i-rarely-hear-about-on-tv-open-thread/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/02/05/news-i-rarely-hear-about-on-tv-open-thread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SusanUnPC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus tax package]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=13410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone has been e-mailing me about this video.  Senator Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) takes President Obama out to the woodshed,  and accuses the president of being &#8220;AWOL on leadership,&#8221; a point I was making in my story last night, &#8220;Is Barack Obama on the Precipice of Becoming Jimmy Carter?&#8220;:

WOW!  Someone with some common [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has been e-mailing me about this video.  Senator Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) takes President Obama out to the woodshed,  and accuses the president of being &#8220;AWOL on leadership,&#8221; a point I was making in my story last night, &#8220;<a href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/02/04/barack-obama-on-the-precipice-of-becoming-jimmy-carter/">Is Barack Obama on the Precipice of Becoming Jimmy Carter?</a>&#8220;:</p>
<p><center><embed type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf' id='mediumFlashEmbedded' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' bgcolor='#000000' allowScriptAccess='always' allowFullScreen='true' quality='high' name='undefined' play='false' scale='noscale' menu='false' salign='LT' scriptAccess='always' wmode='false' height='275' width='305' flashvars='playerId=videolandingpage&#038;playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&#038;categoryTitle=Politics&#038;referralObject=3533965&#038;referralParentPlaylistId=14dd8d0f134b75c8565df1685e721eff8f003aac&#038;referralPlaylistId=c985e69916535a2170b2b18ab0ab7eb60401f9bb' /></center></p>
<p>WOW!  Someone with some common sense!  &#8220;Scaring people is not leadership.&#8221; RIght on, Lindsay!  Right on!  </p>
<p>I just wish there were MORE MEAT like this, by an intelligent and thoughtful guest, than the filler that passes for news but is NOT news.  I&#8217;m also bored stiff by the repetitiveness of TV cable news. I try to watch some so I know what they&#8217;re emphasizing but I always end up turning to NPR or BBC World News.  Today, CNNMSNBCFNN have got the tapes of the plane that landed in the Hudson, and they&#8217;ll be playing that every hour, all day and all evening long. It&#8217;s perfect fare, because it&#8217;s the kind of news that does ALL work for them. It requires no reporters, no investigation, and very little analysis; the networks just toss it up on the screen and let the watchers watch.  </p>
<p>But you&#8217;re probably like me, and you want MORE actual news, so here&#8217;s some of what I&#8217;ve found today:</p>
<p>*** <strong>Sad news:</strong> &#8220;U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surgery today for pancreatic cancer.&#8221; (Via CNN&#8217;s breaking news e-mail)</p>
<p><span id="more-13410"></span><br />
<img src="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/unemp-s.jpg" alt="unemp-s" title="unemp-s" width="280" height="247" class="alignright size-full wp-image-13412" />*** &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/04/AR2009020403831.html?hpid=topnews">Deluge Is Holding Up Benefits to Unemployed</a><br />
Decline in Funding Forces Staff Cuts as Claims Swell:  </p>
<blockquote><p>Thousands of people in the Washington area and hundreds of thousands more across the country are waiting longer than they should for unemployment benefits at a time when they need the money the most because rising joblessness is overwhelming claims offices, records show.</p>
<p>The problem is compounded by a simultaneous decrease in federal funding, which has reduced staffing at some local government offices. The result is that the District and many states, including Maryland and Virginia, are failing to meet federal guidelines that require timely processing of unemployment claims. &#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s likely to get worse. &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>*** Eric Shinseki, the brave general who told the truth to Donald Rumsfeld and ended up with his career ruined, is ON THE JOB as Secretary of the Veterans Administration. </p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123376133792548071.html">WSJ</a>, he&#8217;s beginning with a careful analysis which, from all the stories we&#8217;ve heard about chaos and inefficiency at the VA, sounds like a plan: He is &#8220;launching a top-down review of his embattled department, saying major change is needed soon to ensure the &#8220;highest levels of integrity, transparency and performance.&#8221;  More <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123376133792548071.html">snippets</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our veterans deserve and demand a Department of Veterans Affairs that remains relevant over time, that is responsive to their individual and changing needs, and that cares enough about them to undertake this challenging transformation. We care,&#8221; Mr. Shinseki said in testimony prepared for a House Veterans Affairs Committee hearing Wednesday.</p>
<p>&#8230; Thousands of veterans currently endure six-month waits for disability benefits, and the VA is scrambling to upgrade government technology systems before new legislation providing for millions of dollars in new GI benefits takes effect in August.</p>
<p>In recent weeks, the Government Accountability Office found that the VA was still lowballing budget estimates to Congress at the expense of tens of thousands of patients needing long-term health care. The VA also acknowledged at least nine cases of giving incorrect doses of drugs &#8212; mostly blood-thinning heparin &#8212; due to widespread computer glitches that it didn&#8217;t disclose to patients. &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>*** Ken Rudin, the political blogger for NPR, has a <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/politicaljunkie/2009/02/senate_race_updates.html">fascinating report</a> on the race to succeed Florida&#8217;s retiring senator, Mel Martinez, and also on the future of Minnesota&#8217;s Norm Coleman:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>FLORIDA:</strong></p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Jeb Bush had frozen the GOP field while he was considering the race. Now it&#8217;s Charlie Crist&#8217;s turn. The popular governor said he would sit down with his new wife and discuss it after the legislative session, which ends in May. Crist, like Bush, could probably have the nomination if he wants it. He is barred from seeking a third term in 2010. Way back in 1998, Crist was the GOP Senate nominee against Democratic incumbent Bob Graham and got clobbered by nearly a million votes. But that was a long time ago.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>The latest news has former Sen. Bob Smith (R) thinking about running. That&#8217;s former Sen. Bob Smith <em>of New Hampshire</em>. Smith, who moved to the Sunshine State to sell real estate since losing his seat to Sununu in the 2002 primary, has sent out an email trying to gauge his support.</p>
<p><strong>MINNESOTA:</strong></p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>After a hand recount of 2.9 million voters, Al Franken, the Democratic challenger, has a lead of 225 votes. For the longest time, the assumption (here at least) was that it&#8217;s just a matter of time before Franken is sworn in. But not so fast. On Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the state Supreme Court agreed to review 4,797 previously rejected absentee ballots. This was in response to a motion made by Coleman, who actually wanted the judges to review about 11,000 votes; Franken wanted the scope to be limited to 771 rejected</p>
<p>So the review of nearly 5,000 ballots has begun. Just because they are being looked at does not necessarily mean Coleman will prevail. There&#8217;s no telling how many of the ballots will be reinstated, and it&#8217;s quite possible that Franken could get a healthy portion of them. And, if after this process Coleman moves into the lead, we know that Franken will come up with his own list of ballots he wants reviewed.</p>
<p>We may not know who won the election until March. At the earliest.</p>
<p>[...]</p></blockquote>
<p>So: What else is going on in the big bad world?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/02/05/news-i-rarely-hear-about-on-tv-open-thread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veteran&#8217;s Affairs Chief Crumbles Under Pressure From Congressional Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/12/veterans-affairs-chief-crumbles-under-pressure-from-congressional-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/12/veterans-affairs-chief-crumbles-under-pressure-from-congressional-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NancyA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA Secretary Peake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Admnistration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/12/veterans-affairs-chief-crumbles-under-pressure-from-congressional-democrats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Yahoo, in The Crypt there was a little noticed report that just &#8220;jacks my jaws.&#8221; It seems that Veterans Affairs Secretary Peake can&#8217;t hold his own against Congressional Democrats. They put so &#8220;much pressure&#8221; on him that he reversed his own decision and will now let groups like ACORN and MoveOn.org invade the VA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Yahoo, in <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080909/pl_politico/20944;_ylt=AhaMuaVgEwWvkDoFYlFRCMrCw5R4">The Crypt</a> there was a little noticed report that just &#8220;jacks my jaws.&#8221; It seems that Veterans Affairs Secretary <a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Veterans_Department_not_keen_on_veterans_0410.html">Peake</a> can&#8217;t hold his own against Congressional Democrats. They put so &#8220;much pressure&#8221; on him that he reversed his own decision and will now let groups like ACORN and MoveOn.org invade the VA facilities with voter registrants.</p>
<p>Who do you think is behind this? Obama of course. You know the guy who pays ACORN to commit voter fraud and pays front companies for their work on get-out-the-vote work. It isn&#8217;t bad enough he used ACORN to cheat with the civilian vote, now he is going to use groups to cheat with the veteran vote.</p>
<p>And of course, the asshat has this to say: <span id="more-4696"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Obama issued a statement saying, “I commend Secretary Peake’s decision today. The key will be implementation. We must ensure that the VA’s doors are open to non-partisan groups, as well as state and local government agencies, to enable veterans to register to vote in a timely fashion, complete absentee ballots, and receive rides to the polls.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I have to use the VA for medical services since I am a 100% totally, permanently disabled female Navy veteran. In my opinion, this is a violation of my right to privacy. I don&#8217;t want to be bombarded by voter registrants while I am sitting in a facility I feel is already hostile towards me.</p>
<p>I have been waiting nearly ten years to get my hands fixed which are getting progressively worse, and the VA won&#8217;t fix them. Nope I was told nada, no way but I have to put up with non-partisan groups trying to sign me up to vote because Peake is a coward! Non-partisan groups&#8230;.you mean ACORN, which claims to be non-partisan but generally will run screaming from the sight of a Republican. We know they have not been non-partisan this year as they have worked almost exclusively for Obama from February 2008 to May 2008.</p>
<p>I even called my Congressman, Todd Tiahrt, his office hung up on me in Washington, DC, not interested. Senator Brownback&#8217;s office in DC, said &#8220;we will tell the Senator.&#8221; and I got the brush off from Senator Pat Robert&#8217;s office in DC too. I did get one of Roberts constituent representatives in Wichita, KS to give a damn! She asked me to write a letter that will be sent to the Senator in DC.</p>
<p>The short and long of this is Obama should not be allowed to bring his <strong><em>&#8220;non-partisan groups&#8221;</em> </strong>(<strong>ACORN</strong>) into a facility that is meant for veterans especially since we have to receive out medical treatment there. And we want to receive it in <strong>PEACE</strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/12/veterans-affairs-chief-crumbles-under-pressure-from-congressional-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Skipped Visiting Wounded Troops in Germany</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/07/24/barack-skipped-visiting-wounded-troops-in-germany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/07/24/barack-skipped-visiting-wounded-troops-in-germany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SusanUnPC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soldiers/Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/07/24/barack-skipped-visiting-wounded-troops-in-germany/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack cancelled his visit to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center because, his spokesman said, he decided it would be &#8220;inappropriate&#8221; to do so during a campaign trip.  Wait. I thought this was a mission with fellow senators, touring the embattled countries of Iraq and Afghanistan where these soldiers were wounded. Then there&#8217;s that today he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack cancelled his visit to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center because, his spokesman said, he decided it would be &#8220;inappropriate&#8221; to do so during a campaign trip.  Wait. I thought this was a mission with fellow senators, touring the embattled countries of Iraq and Afghanistan where these soldiers were wounded. Then there&#8217;s that today he told Berliners that he wasn&#8217;t in Berlin as a candidate but as a &#8220;citizen.&#8221; I&#8217;m confused. Well, thankfully, there are good people who visit these soldiers stuck in Germany far from family and friends:</p>
<p><a href='http://noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/2290912451_77be32a3bd.jpg' title='2290912451_77be32a3bd.jpg'><img src='http://noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/2290912451_77be32a3bd.jpg' alt='2290912451_77be32a3bd.jpg' /></a></p>
<p>
<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ americanredcross/2290912451/">Caption</a>: &#8220;Wounded American soldier Ryan Newberry gives a big hug to Eddie, a black lab from the American Red Cross Pet Visitation program. Newberry is recovering at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany and said he really enjoyed the visit.&#8221;</p>
<hr align=left vspace=20 width=94% color=cccccc/>
Bless Eddie.  Bless Ryan.  Then there&#8217;s Barack.  Here&#8217;s what Jake Tapper <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/obama-scrubs-vi.html">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; The German magazine <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,567821,00.html"><strong>Der Spiegel is reporting online</strong></a> that Obama has “cancelled a planned short visit to the Rammstein and Landstuhl U.S. military bases in the southwest German state of Rhineland-Palatinate. The visits were planned for Friday.”</p>
<p>“Barack Obama will not be coming to us,” a spokesperson for the U.S. military hospital in Landstuhl told Der Spiegel. “I don&#8217;t know why.” </p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-3777"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Obama senior adviser Robert Gibbs told ABC News in a statement, “During his trip as part of the CODEL to Afghanistan and Iraq, Sen. Obama visited the combat support hospital in the Green Zone in Baghdad and had a number of other visits with the troops.&nbsp; For the second part of his trip, the senator wanted to visit the men and women at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center to express his gratitude for their service and sacrifice. The senator decided out of respect for these servicemen and women that it would be inappropriate to make a stop to visit troops at a U.S. military facility as part of a trip funded by the campaign.”</p></blockquote>
<p>John McCain&#8217;s campaign didn&#8217;t buy that baloney:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Barack Obama is wrong,&quot; said McCain spokesman Brian Rogers. “It is never ‘inappropriate’ to visit our men and women in the military.&quot; </p>
<p>An Obama adviser, Air Force Maj. Gen. Scott Gration (Ret.), later elaborated on Obama&#8217;s decision to skip the event.</p>
<p>&quot;We learned from the Pentagon last night that the visit would be viewed instead as a campaign event,&quot; Gration said. &quot;Sen. Obama did not want to have a trip to see our wounded warriors perveived as a campaign event when his visit was to show his appreciation for our troops and decided instead not to go.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Good god almighty.  </p>
<p>Well, he had his priorities.</p>
<p>Doing a rock star turn in Berlin definitely trumps visiting wounded soldiers. Definitely.</p>
<p>Although he could claim that visiting the wounded troops was relevant to the work of his committee &#8212; a committee of which he is actually a member, the <a href="http://obama.senate.gov/committees/">Senate Committee on Veterans&#8217; Affairs</a>.</p>
<p>But that involves doing the WORK of the committee instead of just TALKING about the committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/07/24/barack-skipped-visiting-wounded-troops-in-germany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>467</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Letter to Gen. Wesley Clark, Action Alert</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/28/a-letter-to-gen-wesley-clark-action-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/28/a-letter-to-gen-wesley-clark-action-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/28/a-letter-to-gen-wesley-clark-action-alert/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently,  Gen. Clark received the letter below from a young veteran. Failing to provide adequate education benefits for our returning soldiers will only dissuade a large number of our best and brightest from choosing military service over other career options. The armed forces will remain strong only if we attract the most talented Americans with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently,  Gen. Clark received the letter below from a young veteran. Failing to provide adequate education benefits for our returning soldiers will only dissuade a large number of our best and brightest from choosing military service over other career options. The armed forces will remain strong only if we attract the most talented Americans with a promise of a bright future after they have served our country. <a href="http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/15606" title="From Securing America">We can do better.</a> <span id="more-2770"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>21 May 2008</p>
<p>General Clark,</p>
<p>My name is Michael B. I am an Operation Iraqi Freedom Veteran. I served with the 89<sup>th</sup> and 42<sup>nd</sup> Military Police Brigades in Baghdad, Balad and Ashraf, Iraq in 2004 and 2005. I was only 18 years old when I left my home to go and serve my country. I was a member of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard for six years and was just separated in April. I am now 23 years old and cannot use my GI Bill anymore. According to the VA, the chapter 1607 GI Bill that I was using is only available to drilling reservists. And I&#8217;ve been told that I cannot use the Chapter 1606 GI Bill anymore.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you these stories so that you can hear from someone on the &#8216;front lines&#8217; of this battle. I&#8217;ve sent letters to both Senator Bob Casey and Senator Arlen Specter (my senators) asking them to support the new GI Bill. I&#8217;m spreading the word among my fellow vets and my family and friends, asking them to spread the word about Bush and McCain not supporting the GI Bill. I&#8217;ve heard that they won&#8217;t support it because they fear that too many soldiers will want to get out of the military to use their new GI Bill. The net effect of that would be that retention rates drop. Should anyone ever doubt that Americans will stop answering their nation&#8217;s call?</p>
<p>Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain are misguided and fearful. I helped three young men join the Army National Guard recently. All three are satisfactory recruits with bright futures. Never should anyone doubt that our military will crumble because of college tuition assistance. If anything, the new GI Bill will help make the decision to join the military easier.</p>
<p>I greatly admire you sir and have appreciated the work that you do for veterans across America. Thank you for your time. God bless you!</p>
<p>Your Fellow Vet,</p>
<p>Michael B.</p>
<p> <img src="http://www1.va.gov/opa/feature/history/images/gibill.jpg" /></p>
<p> FDR signs the GI Bill. </p>
<p>President Bush has threatened to veto the New GI Bill.  And Sen. John McCain is <strong>just plain wrong</strong> on this. Please contact your senators and let them know <strong>you join thousands of Americans who support our veterans</strong> &#8211; who give so much and ask so little.  Go <a href="http://ga4.org/campaign/gibill?rk=G7waM5dqxGwwE" title="Stop Bush's veto of the GI bill">here.</a></p>
<p>Just a  minute or two and a mouse click sends a strong message that we stand behind our men and women in uniform. Thank you.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/28/a-letter-to-gen-wesley-clark-action-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Combat Veterans: Obama Wasn&#8217;t Available To Meet With Us</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/26/illinois-combat-veterans-obama-wasnt-available-to-meet-with-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/26/illinois-combat-veterans-obama-wasnt-available-to-meet-with-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uppity Woman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/26/illinois-combat-veterans-obama-wasnt-available-to-meet-with-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Barack Obama ignored another constituency when the cameras weren&#8217;t rolling.  And now Democrats will have to pay.  This is why we must nominate Hillary Clinton, our only chance to beat John McCain in the fall.
Below is a Commercial made by a nonpartisan not for profit organization named Vets for Freedom Political [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Barack Obama ignored another constituency when the cameras weren&#8217;t rolling.  And now Democrats will have to pay.  This is why we must nominate Hillary Clinton, our only chance to beat John McCain in the fall.</p>
<p>Below is a Commercial made by a nonpartisan not for profit organization named <em>Vets for Freedom Political Action Committee</em>. In it, an Iraq combat veteran from Illinois discusses how he and 12 other combat veterans were unable to meet with Barack Obama. This vet wants to know why it is that Barack Obama is willing to meet with despots and terrorist leaders but not with Generals or combat veterans. He wants to know how it is that Barack Obama is so smart about the Middle East when he hasn&#8217;t even been there during his two and a half years in the Senate.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;If Barack Obama won&#8217;t listen to us, who <em>will</em> he listen to?&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://blip.tv/scripts/flash/showplayer.swf?enablejs=true&#038;feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvetsforfreedomtv%2Eblip%2Etv%2Frss&#038;file=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Frss%2Fflash%2F935295%3Freferrer%3Dblip%2Etv%26source%3D1&#038;showplayerpath=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Fscripts%2Fflash%2Fshowplayer%2Eswf" width="400" height="255" allowfullscreen="true" id="showplayer"><param name="movie" value="http://blip.tv/scripts/flash/showplayer.swf?enablejs=true&#038;feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvetsforfreedomtv%2Eblip%2Etv%2Frss&#038;file=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Frss%2Fflash%2F935295%3Freferrer%3Dblip%2Etv%26source%3D1&#038;showplayerpath=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Fscripts%2Fflash%2Fshowplayer%2Eswf" /><param name="quality" value="best" /><embed src="http://blip.tv/scripts/flash/showplayer.swf?enablejs=true&#038;feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvetsforfreedomtv%2Eblip%2Etv%2Frss&#038;file=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Frss%2Fflash%2F935295%3Freferrer%3Dblip%2Etv%26source%3D1&#038;showplayerpath=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Fscripts%2Fflash%2Fshowplayer%2Eswf" quality="best" width="400" height="255" name="showplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object><br />
<span id="more-2711"></span><br />
Republicans and John McCain are ready to pounce on the unprepared and unqualified Senator of Illinois.  This is yet another reason why Democrats must nominate Hillary Clinton, who would never ignore our veterans and our men and women in uniform.  Do Democrats seriously think Obama will win against McCain if two of the important issues of this election are national security and veterans&#8217; issues?  We are in for a long and uncomfortable ride this November if they actually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/26/illinois-combat-veterans-obama-wasnt-available-to-meet-with-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Obama, Debate This</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/20/senator-obama-debate-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/20/senator-obama-debate-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Shane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush/Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commander in Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soldiers/Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GI Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-bid contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private security contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. John Murtha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/20/senator-obama-debate-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been blogging for months, asking Barack Obama to be clear about how he differs from Hillary Clinton in their Iraq exit plans. Now he claims he&#8217;ll be too busy campaigning to make time for another critical debate. So, I&#8217;ll tell you where he stands, and he can correct me, if he&#8217;s changed his `plan&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been blogging for months, asking Barack Obama to be clear about how he differs from Hillary Clinton in their Iraq exit plans. Now he claims he&#8217;ll be too busy campaigning to make time for another critical debate. So, I&#8217;ll tell you where he stands, and he can correct me, if he&#8217;s changed his `plan&#8217; but hasn&#8217;t yet mentioned it.</p>
<p>It seems to me that Barack isn&#8217;t sure how to get out of Iraq. His statement &#8220;we&#8217;ll get out as carefully as we went in carelessly&#8221; isn&#8217;t substantive. &nbsp; Additionally he has taken a position that leads me to think he can&#8217;t get us out. &nbsp;Barack plans to leave in place those contracts that went to Bush&#8217;s cronies without the need to bid. (Bush made a big deal out of prohibiting international interests from gaining any financial stake in Iraq&#8217;s possible success and instead &#8220;rewarded&#8221; his friends with those no-bid contracts that have cost taxpayers, or China, whichever you prefer, so much of our wealth.)</p>
<p>Barack also intends to keep private armies protecting those contractors. It will be impossible for any real diplomacy to take place while we occupy Iraq, either with troops or with contractors. <span id="more-2224"></span></p>
<p>No nation wants to risk the lives of their own citizens for a war that enriches Bush&#8217;s friends. &nbsp;Hillary&#8217;s plan is substantive and she&#8217;ll do it, whether or not she&#8217;s called a loser, whether or not the violence goes up while we&#8217;re leaving, and she won&#8217;t reoccupy the country under any circumstance. &nbsp;She understands that this war is a disaster and she&#8217;d not willing to risk one more American or Iraqi life to `give&#8217; Iraq&#8217;s so-called freely elected government any more chances. &nbsp;It&#8217;s over, when she&#8217;s elected we&#8217;ll get out of there.</p>
<p>She has been clear and consistent on the question of exiting Iraq. Today she released an even clearer statement on her exit plans and her plans to repair our military and help our veterans of war. &nbsp;(below)</p>
<p>So, Senator Obama, are you too busy campaigning to explain why you want Bush&#8217;s contracts enforced, why you plan to protect them with private armies, how you expect diplomacy to work if we&#8217;re occupying with contractors, and why you think the Iraqi government would compromise if you&#8217;re elected president? &nbsp;</p>
<p>___________________________</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=7161">Hillary Clinton: Ready to End the War in Iraq</a></strong> &#8211; April 18, 2008 press release</p>
<p>Today, in Radnor, Pennsylvania , Hillary Clinton was joined by Congressman and retired vice admiral Joe Sestak as she outlined her plan to end the war responsibly. Five years after the start of the war, we have come to a crossroads. </p>
<p>The war has sapped our military and economic strength, damaged U.S. national security, taken the lives of almost 4,000 brave young men and women in uniform, and placed a lasting toll on the tens of thousands of wounded, many with invisible injuries like Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Bush-Cheney-McCain strategy is to continue this failed policy. </p>
<p>We need to end this war and bring our troops home swiftly, responsibly, and safely. We need to press the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own country. We need to rebuild our alliances and enlist the international community in securing stability in Iraq and the region. </p>
<p> &nbsp;We need a Commander-in-Chief who is both committed to ending this war and who has the strength, experience, and leadership to do it the right way. Hillary Clinton is that candidate. As President, she will: &nbsp; I. Start Bringing Our Troops Home &nbsp; Bring Our Troops Home. As President, one of Hillary&#8217;s first official actions will be to convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff, her Secretary of Defense, and her National Security Council and direct them to draw up a a clear, comprehensive plan to bring home our troops, swiftly and responsibly, beginning within 60 days. </p>
<p>Under Hillary&#8217;s plan the United States will retain counterterrorism forces in Iraq and the region to fight al Qaeda and will not permit terrorists to have a safe haven in Iraq from which to attack the United States , its allies, or its interests. &nbsp;Reduce Strains on Our Troops. </p>
<p>The war is placing tremendous strain on our armed forces, courting strategic risks posed by a force that is stretched to the breaking point. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will also adopt the proposals of Rep. John Murtha that, for every month they spend in the field, soldiers will be guaranteed one month here at home. Our Marines will have a similar standard appropriate for their service. The Army&#8217;s policy goals and practice until the Iraq war were to have at least twice as much time at home for active duty soldiers as in the field and at least four times as much time at home as in the field for National Guard and Reserve. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will reestablish these as long-term goals for our armed forces. &nbsp; Remove Armed Private Military Contractors in Iraq . As U.S. troops begin to withdraw, we should not be leaving unaccountable, often irresponsible private military contractors to carry arms and engage in combat-oriented missions and security functions. Hillary has co-sponsored the Stop Security Outsourcing Act, which seeks to end this practice. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will work toward a ban on armed private military contractors providing security for diplomatic personnel. &nbsp;Stop Wasting Money on No-Bid Contracts. Spending on federal contracts has been the fastest-growing part of the discretionary budget over the past six years, yet has received little attention. </p>
<p>Under this Administration, the number of no-bid contracts has more than doubled, and between 2000 and 2006, spending on these contracts has increased 121 percent to $103 billion, representing more than half of federal procurement spending. During this time, companies like Halliburton have enjoyed record profits, thanks to a 700 percent increase in taxpayer funds awarded to them. </p>
<p>A recent Congressional report identified a wide range of contracts, running into the hundreds of billions of dollars, where federal auditors found massive overcharges, wasteful spending, and poor oversight. Hillary has proposed a measure that would create a new &#8220;point of order&#8221; against any spending bill in Fiscal 2009 that does not explicitly require a federal agency&#8217;s compliance with competitive contracting rules. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will work to ensure that this becomes law and that we stop wasting money on no-bid contracts. &nbsp; II. Secure Stability in Iraq As We Bring Our Troops Home &nbsp; Greater political and economic stability means safer conditions for our departing troops and a smoother disengagement from our military&#8217;s missions across Iraq . </p>
<p>In order to foster stability as U.S. troops begin to redeploy, Hillary will focus on political reconciliation inside Iraq and holding the Iraqi government accountable for political and economic progress. She will: &nbsp;Call on the United Nations to Play a Greater Role in Addressing Domestic Strife in Iraq . As President, Hillary will press the United Nations to play a greater role in bringing about national accommodation in Iraq , as it did with positive results in Bosnia , East Timor , and elsewhere. </p>
<p>The UN has already provided valuable technical assistance to Iraq , and is far more likely to be viewed as a neutral, honest broker than the United States &#8211; especially when it acts on behalf of a broad coalition of concerned states and the international community. The new UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, has indicated he is willing to play a key role in assisting the Iraqis, and Hillary will ensure that the UN envoy in Iraq has the necessary authority by obtaining the Security Council&#8217;s explicit endorsement of a strengthened UN mandate to promote reconciliation. &nbsp;Pursue an Integrated Strategy to Bring Stability to Iraq . </p>
<p>The surge has emphasized a bottom-up strategy that has reduced violence in the short term but, in the absence of an effective national strategy, risks deepening sectarian and intrasectarian divisions within Iraq in the long run. For example, the United States has established and armed local security elements &#8211; the Awakening in Anbar, for example, and other &#8220;Concerned Local Citizens&#8221; elsewhere &#8211; without getting the Iraqi government to live up to its agreement to integrate significant numbers of these local militias and &#8220;volunteers&#8221; into provincial police forces or the national Army. As President, Hillary will pursue a strategy that seeks to empower local leaders, but she will prioritize national accommodation, which is essential to stability. </p>
<p>She will do this by using U.S. and international influence and assistance as leverage to press the Iraqis to reach agreement on key issues, including provincial elections, the hydrocarbon law, and on the overall nature of federalism. &nbsp;Appoint a Special Counsel to Make Reconstruction Funds Accountable. As Iraq &#8217;s oil production increases, the potential revenue accumulated from oil production should increasingly fund Iraq &#8217;s reconstruction, instead of U.S. taxpayer money. </p>
<p>Since 2006, Iraq has earned more than $80 billion from oil, and that figure is growing rapidly. Nevertheless, since the beginning of the war, the U.S. has provided roughly the same amount of money as the Iraqi government to rebuild the country (the United States has appropriated roughly $47 billion; the government of Iraq $50 billion). </p>
<p>Even as we send billions to Iraq while they earn billions in oil revenues, there are increasing reports that the Iraqi government is not spending its budget allocated for reconstruction. The Comptroller General of the U.S. testified that the capital expenditure rate for the central ministries in Iraq was only 7% as of November 2007. Hillary is committed to ensuring that Iraqi oil revenue is dedicated to reconstruction funding &#8211; and that the money is actually spent, so that Iraqi citizens receive basic services, such as electricity and clean drinking water, which are currently lacking for so many. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will appoint a special counsel to investigate where Iraq &#8217;s oil profits are going and how reconstruction funds are being spent &#8211; or not spent. She will ensure that reconstruction funds are spent wisely before providing the Iraqi government with more. &nbsp;Combat the Black Market in Oil to Dry Up Funds for the Insurgency. Corruption and stolen oil sold on the black market constitute a critical funding source for the insurgency. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will boost joint U.S.-Iraqi efforts to combat corruption and protect the oil supply. She will direct her Secretary of Defense to plan a nationwide U.S.-Iraqi crackdown on oil black marketers, ensuring that U.S. and Iraqi personnel have the resources and manpower necessary. </p>
<p>This effort will be designed to disrupt lines of funding for the insurgency, to increase stability, and to reduce attacks on our troops during the withdrawal. Hillary will direct the U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction to conduct regular reports on corruption in the oil industry. She will be prepared to withhold portions of aid if the Iraqi government does not show meaningful results in its anti-corruption efforts. </p>
<p>Finally, Hillary will double the funding for oil pipeline exclusion zones, which prevent illegal tapping and attacks on pipelines; and she will also provide resources to stop cross-border smuggling of black market oil. &nbsp; III. A New Regional Diplomatic Initiative &nbsp; Enlist the International Community to Stabilize the Region. Our allies and friends in the region all have a stake in a stable Iraq . Until now, in part because of the way the Bush Administration has behaved, they have gotten a free pass. No longer. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will have a unique opportunity to reach out to our allies and partners in the region and press them to take greater responsibility for what happens in Iraq . She will hold a major regional stabilization conference early in her Presidency. This group will be composed of key allies, other global powers, and all of the states bordering Iraq , including Iran and Syria . The mission of this group will be to develop and implement a strategy to create a stable Iraq . In advance of that meeting, Hillary will confer with our treaty allies as well as our friends in the region to coordinate policy before gathering with the larger group of nations. One of her first international meetings as President will be with these leaders, including Saudi Arabia , the Gulf States , Jordan , and Egypt , as well as our European allies in order to push for greater responsible action towards Iraq , including more assistance. This will send a strong signal of our country&#8217;s determination &#8211; as we draw down our forces &#8211; to ensure that the rest of the world plays its part in stabilizing Iraq . Hillary will then convene a regional stabilization group composed of key allies, other global powers, and all of the states bordering Iraq . </p>
<p>The mission of this group will be to develop and implement a strategy to create a stable Iraq . &nbsp;Provide for Refugees. As our forces redeploy out of Iraq , Hillary will also organize a major international effort under the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to address the needs of Iraqi refugees. The UN will also play a role, helping to deal with the resettlement of refugees and others displaced from their homes, a number which now exceeds four million. With the price of oil at record levels, the government of Iraq now has considerable financial resources available. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will also press the UN to establish a mechanism by which some of those Iraqi funds could be used to feed, clothe, shelter, and otherwise provide for these millions of refugees. Addressing the upheaval caused by this displacement will facilitate a smoother exit and a less risky end to the war. &nbsp; IV. A Champion for Veterans &nbsp; When our troops come home, we must make sure they receive the care and respect that they deserve. </p>
<p>When Hillary is President, she will make sure that every member of our armed forces will receive a fair shot at the American Dream when their service is over. She will ensure that every veteran in America will have health care. She will work so that every veteran receives the benefits they have earned and the assistance they need &#8211; right from the start. And she will make sure no soldier ever loses a bonus because he or she has been injured in service. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will: &nbsp;Enact a GI Bill of Rights for the 21st Century. Hillary will enact a GI Bill of Rights for the 21st Century that will resurrect the spirit of the original 1944 GI Bill and offer service members, veterans and their families with expanded education, housing and entrepreneurial benefits. Her plan will guarantee equal access for all components of the Armed Forces &#8212; Active, Guard and Reserve &#8212; that have deployed overseas in support of a combat operation since September 11 or served two years of active duty since September 11. She will fund undergraduate education for service members, as well as education for specialized trade or technical training, and certification and licensing programs. She will make GI educational benefits transferable within families. She will expand the VA Home Loan Guaranty program to allow veterans to use low-interest, no-fee loans to purchase, build or improve a home valued up to $625,000. She will establish a Veterans Microloan Program to provide veterans with no-collateral, low-interest microloans of up to $100,000 for entrepreneurial ventures. &nbsp;Provide Affordable and Quality Health Care for All Veterans. </p>
<p>As President, Hillary will ensure that all of the 1.8 million uninsured veterans in this country have access to quality, affordable health care. She will restore the Clinton-era policy that opened the VA&#8217;s excellent and cost-effective health care system to all veterans who seek to enroll. She will make a long-term commitment to the VA system to ensure it is adequately funded and has the capacity to avoid backlogs and to handle greater enrollments. And she will provide coverage through the American Health Choices Plan to all veterans who choose not to use the VA system. &nbsp;Ensure All Veterans Receive the Benefits They Have Earned and the Assistance They Need &#8212; Right from the Start. As President, Hillary will commit to getting a fair, accurate, and timely decision for every veteran filing a disability claim. </p>
<p>She will increase the number of qualified VA evaluators to reduce the backlog of claims. She will provide fast-track training for new claims specialists and expand the Benefits Delivery at Discharge Program to smooth the transition from service to discharge for all those who serve our country. &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/20/senator-obama-debate-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
